court filing: 21-50249
The court rejects the government's proposals for in-person attorney visits with defendant Robertson, citing uncertainty and risk related to COVID-19 protocols. The court also denies the government's request for a stay pending appeal, citing failure to apply the relevant legal standard.
Summary
The court rejects the government's proposals for in-person attorney visits with defendant Robertson, citing uncertainty and risk related to COVID-19 protocols. The court also denies the government's request for a stay pending appeal, citing failure to apply the relevant legal standard.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (1)
Related Documents (6)
EFTA01402022
Court opinion discusses legal standards for aiding and abetting and FSIA defenses, referencing Prince Sultan and Prince Turki
The passage is a doctrinal discussion of case law on conspiracy, aiding and abetting, and FSIA defenses. It mentions foreign princes only in passing and provides no concrete allegations, transactions, Cites Halberstam and Bowm cases to outline elements of aiding and abetting and civil conspiracy. Notes Judge Robertson’s view that Prince Sultan’s and Prince Turki’s FSIA defenses do not raise caus E
court filing: Case 1:21-cr-00249
The document discusses the court's consideration of Mr. Robertson's bail, taking into account his history of violating conditions of release, prior convictions, and the nature of the charges against him, ultimately weighing the potential danger posed by his release against his presumed innocence.
Checkpoint Contents
EFTA02055665
EFTA01356272
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.