Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-7104Court UnsealedTestimony

Court Transcript: 212-2

The transcript captures a court hearing where attorneys argue over pro hac vice motions for Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards, with the defense contesting due to potential witness testimony and confidentiality concerns. The judge denies the motions without prejudice, requesting additional information before reconsidering.

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: 212-2
Pages
30
Persons
7
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The transcript captures a court hearing where attorneys argue over pro hac vice motions for Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards, with the defense contesting due to potential witness testimony and confidentiality concerns. The judge denies the motions without prejudice, requesting additional information before reconsidering.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Dershowitz, 410 F.Supp.3d 564 (2019)

Dershowitz, 410 F.Supp.3d 564 (2019) derives from their inherent power to preserve adversary process's integrity. KeyCite Yellow Flag - Negative Treatment Distinguished by Penrose Hill, Limited v. Mabmy, N.D.Cal., August 18, 2020 410 F.Supp.3d 564 United States District Court, S.D. New York. Plaintiff, v. Alan DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. 19 Civ. 3377 (LAP) 10/16/2019 Synopsis Background: Plaintiff brought action alleging that defendant defamed her by making public statements that she was liar, had committed perjury, and was conspiring with law firm to extort him and others by claiming that she was forced to engage in sexual activity with him. Defendant moved to dismiss and to disqualify law firm Holdings: The District Court, Loretta A. Preska, Senior District Judge, held that: III single publication rule did not apply to bar claim on limitations grounds; (2) plaintiffs allegations were sufficient to defeat defendant's claim to qualified self-defense privilege; and

16p
Court UnsealedDepositionApr 14, 2020

Giuffre

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1049 Filed 04/14/20 Page 1 of 91 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) -against- ORDER GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: The Court has reviewed and approved the parties’ joint proposed redacted Decided Motions List that was submitted to the Court on April 3, 2020. (See dkt. no. 1045.) That redacted Decided Motions List is attache

91p
Court UnsealedDepositionJul 31, 2020

[REDACTED - Survivor] Deposition May 2016

Case Document 1090-32 Filed 07/30/20 Page 1 of 89 EXHIBIT Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1090-32 Filed 07/30/20 Page 2 of 89 GIUFFRE VS. MAXWELL Deposition [REDACTED - Survivor] 05/03/2016 _______________________________________________________________________ Agren Blando Court Reporting & Video, Inc. 216 16th Street, Suite 600 Denver Colorado, 80202 303-296-0017 Agren Blando Court Reporting & Video, Inc. Page 3 of 89 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1090-32 Filed 07/30/20 Page 1 IN THE UNI

89p
OtherUnknown

NAME SEARCHED: Jeffrey Epstein

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01296720

114p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

H3ulgiva

94p
OtherUnknown

NAME SEARCHED:

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01297296

22p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.