deposition transcript: 2684
The witness is being questioned about their knowledge of a $50 million lawsuit filed by Mr. Leopold against Jeffrey Epstein on their behalf. Mr. Leopold instructs the witness not to answer questions that involve discussions between them, citing protection. The witness ultimately testifies that they have no knowledge of the lawsuit outside of conversations with Mr. Leopold.
Summary
The witness is being questioned about their knowledge of a $50 million lawsuit filed by Mr. Leopold against Jeffrey Epstein on their behalf. Mr. Leopold instructs the witness not to answer questions that involve discussions between them, citing protection. The witness ultimately testifies that they have no knowledge of the lawsuit outside of conversations with Mr. Leopold.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Related Documents (6)
Transcript excerpt questioning witness about alleged Epstein involvement and police statements
The passage provides a vague courtroom exchange about Jeffrey Epstein and a witness's statements, but lacks concrete names of powerful actors, specific dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It off Witness was asked if Epstein ever visited his father's house – answer: no. Witness denied that Epstein's associates tampered with his father's tires. Witness claimed to have told police they did not
Transcript excerpt from House Oversight hearing referencing Epstein and parental police report
The passage contains a fragmented dialogue with no concrete names, dates, or transactions. It merely alludes to a police report about Jeffrey Epstein and mentions parental testimony, but provides no a Witness is questioned about a police report filed by their parents concerning Jeffrey Epstein. The dialogue suggests possible coaching of testimony, which could imply procedural improprieties. Refere
Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 1 of 116 From ne Page 47/51 Date. 5/29/2008 12 09 L' • Si esta responder u la demanda per su cueille, al mismo tiempo en que prise= su respucsta ante il tribunal, debeni ustett envier por comme o entregar une copia de su rapueste a la persona denominada abaju corne "PlaintifUPlaintiffs Attorney" (Demandante o Abogado del Demandante). "De acuerdo con el Acto 6 Decreto de los Ameriennsos con Impedirnentos, inhabilitados, persona.; en necesidad del servicio special para panicipar en este procedimiento deberin, dcntm de un 'derme rezonable, antes de cualquier proœdimicnto, ponerse en contacto con is officine Administratutiva dc la Cone, 205 North Dixie Highway, oficina 52500, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, Téléfono (561) 355-2431, 1-800-955-8771 (I'DD) 6 1-800-955-8770 (V), Via Floride Relay Service". pv1FOR'FANT Des poursuites judiciaires ont etc entreprises contre vous. Vous avez 20 jours ormsecu
ROY BLACK
ROY BLACK HOWARD M. SREBNICK SaYIT A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STUMPY? MARIA NEYRA JACKIE PERCZEK MARK A.J.lAPIRO JARED BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN STUMPF P.A. May 18, 2010 VIA EMAIL AND U.S. MAIL Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 RE: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Counsel: JESSICA FONSECA-NADER KATHLEEN P. PHILLIPS AARON ANTHON MARCOS BEATON, JR. JENIPER J. SOULUCIAS NOAH FOX JOSHUA SHORE E-Mail: RBlack(lfioyBlack.com Jeff Sloman, Esq. United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 Assistant United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 We received notice this morning that Podhurst Orseck, P.A. has filed a civil complaint seeking over $2,000,000 in addition to the $526,000 they have already been paid by Jeffrey Epstein for their work as attorney representatives. As we communicated to you during our February 3, 2010
Epstein Drop Three
January 5, 2024 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Pursuant to the Court’s December 18, 2023, unsealing order, and following conferral with Defendant, Plaintiff files this set of documents ordered unsealed. The filing of these documents ordered unsealed will be done on a rolling basis until c
Transcript excerpt shows alleged false statements to police about Jeffrey Epstein
The passage contains a vague interrogation about alleged false statements to police concerning Jeffrey Epstein. It lacks concrete names beyond Epstein, no dates, transactions, or actionable details, a Witness is questioned about lying to police regarding Epstein allegedly trying to murder his father. No documentary evidence or specific statements are presented. The dialogue references a prior tape
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.