Court Opinion: 310-1
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania considered Cosby's appeal, focusing on whether the District Attorney's 2005 decision not to prosecute Cosby should be enforced, given that it led to Cosby's incriminating testimony in a civil deposition. The court ultimately decided that the decision not to prosecute must be enforced, which disposed of the appeal.
Summary
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania considered Cosby's appeal, focusing on whether the District Attorney's 2005 decision not to prosecute Cosby should be enforced, given that it led to Cosby's incriminating testimony in a civil deposition. The court ultimately decided that the decision not to prosecute must be enforced, which disposed of the appeal.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 310
The defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan, drawing parallels between Maxwell's case and the recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision in Commonwealth v. Cosby, arguing that the government reneged on its promise not to prosecute Maxwell, similar to the Cosby case. The letter requests the court to consider this new precedent in deciding on the pending motion to dismiss certain counts of the indictment against Maxwell.
• Menu
EFTA Document EFTA01615048
EFTA02429791
From: Richard Kahn
EFTA02354926
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.