Court Filing: 509-1
The government argues that Dr. Ryan Hall's testimony should be excluded as irrelevant, more prejudicial than probative, and consisting of inadmissible hearsay. The government disputes the defendant's claims that Dr. Hall's opinions are admissible under various rules of evidence, and argues that the testimony is an attempt to attack Minor Victim-4's credibility without a valid basis.
Summary
The government argues that Dr. Ryan Hall's testimony should be excluded as irrelevant, more prejudicial than probative, and consisting of inadmissible hearsay. The government disputes the defendant's claims that Dr. Hall's opinions are admissible under various rules of evidence, and argues that the testimony is an attempt to attack Minor Victim-4's credibility without a valid basis.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Related Documents (6)
EFTA01658773
EFTA Document EFTA01655706
EFTA00010037
EFTA Document EFTA01658773
EFTA01659151
EFTA00010040
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.