Court Filing: 525
The defense responds to the government's letter arguing that the '900 series photos' of Jeffrey Epstein's apartment are inadmissible due to lack of authentication and relevance, as they were taken in 2019, long after the alleged events. The defense argues that without testimony confirming the photos accurately depict the apartment during the relevant time period, they are irrelevant and potentially misleading. The court had previously sustained the defense's objection to the photos' admission.
Summary
The defense responds to the government's letter arguing that the '900 series photos' of Jeffrey Epstein's apartment are inadmissible due to lack of authentication and relevance, as they were taken in 2019, long after the alleged events. The defense argues that without testimony confirming the photos accurately depict the apartment during the relevant time period, they are irrelevant and potentially misleading. The court had previously sustained the defense's objection to the photos' admission.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Related Documents (6)
EFTA00038962
Court Transcript: 749
The transcript captures a discussion between the defense and the court regarding the admissibility of certain photographs and testimony related to a search of Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence. The defense objects to specific exhibits, arguing they are prejudicial and not relevant to the case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
EFTA00014671
EFTA00029590
Letter Motion
Letter Motion, USA v. Maxwell, No. 1:20-cr-00330-1 (S.D.N.Y. Jul 21, 2020)
EFTA00032823
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.