Passenger Manifest: 5614788553
This is a passenger manifest for a flight on Jeffrey Epstein's private jet on May 19, 2005, from Teterboro, NJ to West Palm Beach, FL, listing Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and Adriana Mucinska as passengers. The document includes flight details and aircraft performance data. It was produced as part of a public records request.
Summary
This is a passenger manifest for a flight on Jeffrey Epstein's private jet on May 19, 2005, from Teterboro, NJ to West Palm Beach, FL, listing Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and Adriana Mucinska as passengers. The document includes flight details and aircraft performance data. It was produced as part of a public records request.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Related Documents (6)
Epstein Flight Logs Lolita Express
FIightLogsOnly According to newly filed court documents obtained by RadarOnline.com, ?ight logs that have been ?led in court and released to the media were potentially ?sanitized" to protect the men who palled around with the convicted sex offender. In particular. the attorneys note, ?Dershowitz suggests that the aircraft ?ight manifests will exonerate him. In media statements, Dershowitz has repeatedly brought up the manifests as proof of innocence.? But they point out, ?Coincidentally and
Subject: Times: How a Ring of Women Allegedly Recruited Girls for Jeffrey Epstein
From: Subject: Times: How a Ring of Women Allegedly Recruited Girls for Jeffrey Epstein Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 19:19:07 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.jpg; image002.jpg; image003.jpg; image004.jpg; image005.jpg; image006.jpg; image007.jpg How a Ring of Women Allegedly Recruited Girls for Jeffrey Epstein After Mr. Epstein's suicide, his inner circle of girlfriends, employees and other associates is now under scrutiny by prosecutors. EFTA00040611 EFTA00040612 Imag Sarah Kellen, left, and Ghislaine Maxwell, have been accused in lawsuits of helping Jeffrey Epstein recruit teenage girls and young women for sex.CreditCreditPatrick McMullan, via Getty Images By Amy Julia Harris, Frances Robles, Mike Baker and William K. Rashbaum Aug. 29, 2019, 2:54 p.m. ET EFTA00040613 [What you need to know to start the day: Get New York Today in your [REDACTED - Survivor] was a 16-year-old South Florida high school student when an acquaintance from school approached her at a local pool with an intr
5(19/22, 3:52 PM SEA At. "250SC. fktmct
5(19/22, 3:52 PM SEA At. "250SC. fktmct JcereY Epsteh - Wildpedla Epstein a massage". She claims she was taken to his mansion, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with her, and paid her $200 immediately afterward.1io61 A similar $50-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer.E•g-91 These and several similar lawsuits were dismissed.1139-) All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of court' ll Epstein made many art-pl-atirt r s_ettlements with alleged victims.W23 - - - _ E_XCAt "-Vet 5sE RItACt PnOi- CiOR °NICER • - 40L'aritfrieerPROS1 1701-i0.Ni o> SIE•us) i1/44".,e036( C ; Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, November 30, 2018. Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014)*SC7ck%A L. ne,OSC Rt p Rom N)Eiszci poS IT c"),3 A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe 1 ([REDACTED - Survivor]) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Vi
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant
Exhibit F
Exhibit F EFTA00040089 Case 1:10-cv-21586-ASG Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/17/2010 Page 1 of 15 COMPOSITE EXHIBIT A NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT AND ADDENDUM EFTA00040090 Case 1:10-cv-21586-ASG Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/17/2010 Page 2 of 15 IN RE: INVESTIGATION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT IT APPEARING that the City of Palm Beach Police Department and the State Attorney's Office for the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (hereinafter, the "State Attorney's Office") have conducted an investigation into the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"); IT APPEARING that the State Attorney's Office has charged Epstein by indictment µith solicitation of prostitution, in violation of Florida Statutes Section 796.07; IT APPEARING that the United States Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation have conducted their own investigation into Epstein's background and any offenses that may have been commit
Epstein Depositions
10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.