Court Filing: 615

Court Filing: 635

The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan proposing questions to be asked of Juror 50 during a public hearing to investigate whether Juror 50 provided false answers on his juror questionnaire. The proposed questions relate to Juror 50's experiences with sexual abuse and his ability to be fair and impartial during the trial. The hearing is a result of the Court's February 24, 2022 Opinion and Order.

Court Filing: 648

The government opposes Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a new trial, arguing that Juror 50 did not deliberately lie during voir dire and that even if he had disclosed being a victim of sexual abuse, it wouldn't have been a valid basis for a challenge for cause. The government contends that Maxwell received a fair trial and that the verdict's integrity remains intact.

Court Filing: 643

The government's memorandum opposes Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a new trial, arguing that the defendant has not met the burden of proving juror misconduct. The government consents to a limited hearing to investigate Juror 50's statements but argues that extensive discovery and an expansive hearing are unwarranted.

EFTA00032823

Maxwell Petition

No. 24-____ WILSON-EPES PRINTING CO., INC. – (202) 789-0096 – WASHINGTON, D.C. 20002 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ———— GHISLAINE MAXWELL, AKA SEALED DEFENDANT 1, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ———— On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ———— PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ———— DAVID OSCAR MARKUS Counsel of Record MARKUS/MOSS PLLC 40 N.W. Third Street Penthouse One Miami, FL 33128 (30

court filing: 617

The US Attorney's Office filed a letter with the court arguing that Juror 50's motion to intervene and access certain materials should be publicly filed without redactions. The defense opposes public filing, claiming it's not a judicial document. The prosecution counters that the motion is a judicial document and that no redactions are justified.