Court Filing: 666
The MARSH law firm requests on behalf of their clients, [REDACTED - Survivor] and [REDACTED - Survivor], that they be allowed to speak at Ghislaine Maxwell's upcoming sentencing hearing, citing their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The letter is addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan and copied to various parties involved in the case.
Summary
The MARSH law firm requests on behalf of their clients, [REDACTED - Survivor] and [REDACTED - Survivor], that they be allowed to speak at Ghislaine Maxwell's upcoming sentencing hearing, citing their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The letter is addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan and copied to various parties involved in the case.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (5)
“The MARSH law firm requests on behalf of their clients, Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, that they be allowed to speak at Ghislaine Maxwell's upcoming sentencing hearing, citing their rig...”
Robert Y. LewisAlison NathanGhislaine Maxwell“...sts on behalf of their clients, Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, that they be allowed to speak at Ghislaine Maxwell's upcoming sentencing hearing, citing their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The letter...”
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 667
The letter, written by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, argues that [REDACTED - Survivor] and [REDACTED - Survivor] do not qualify as 'crime victims' under the CVRA because their alleged victimization occurred after the conduct underlying the offenses charged against Maxwell ended in 2004. The letter requests that the court clarify who will be permitted to speak at the sentencing proceeding.
Declaration: 675-1
Robert Y. Lewis declares that he represents victims [REDACTED - Survivor] and [REDACTED - Survivor] and submitted their Victim Impact Statements to the probation office for inclusion in Ghislane Maxwell's Presentence Report before the June 3 deadline.
Court Order: 686
The court has received victim impact statements from several individuals and has decided to allow some of them to make oral statements at sentencing, while others will be heard in writing only. The court has also denied the defendant's redaction requests.
Letter to the Court: doj-ogr-00010725
This letter, written by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, opposes the motion by [REDACTED - Survivor] and [REDACTED - Survivor] to give oral victim impact statements during Maxwell's sentencing, arguing they are not statutory crime victims under the CVRA.
Maxwell impact statements
212-243-1100 • Main 225 Broadway, Suite 715 917-912-9698 • Cell New York, NY 10007 888-587-4737 • Fax bcsternheim@mac.com June 24, 2022 Submission Under Seal Honorable Alison J. Nathan Sitting By Designation United States District Court 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: Ghislaine Maxwell submits this letter in response to the Court’s order (Dkt. 665). Ms. Maxwell objects to characterization of [REDACTED - Survivor], Maria F
Court Filing: 678
The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, responding to a court order regarding the application by two victims, [REDACTED - Survivor] and [REDACTED - Survivor], to speak at Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing. The government defers to the court's previous order on the matter, which allowed non-direct victims to submit written statements but not speak at the hearing.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.