Court Order: 686
The court has received victim impact statements from several individuals and has decided to allow some of them to make oral statements at sentencing, while others will be heard in writing only. The court has also denied the defendant's redaction requests.
Summary
The court has received victim impact statements from several individuals and has decided to allow some of them to make oral statements at sentencing, while others will be heard in writing only. The court has also denied the defendant's redaction requests.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (10)
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing: 682
The court allows seven individuals to submit written statements as part of the sentencing record in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, despite the defendant's objections. The court denies the defendant's request for redactions, citing the presumption of public access to court documents. The written statements will be made public without redactions.
Court Filing: 703
The Government is moving to preclude the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, from introducing a sale agreement for her London home as evidence in her case-in-chief due to her failure to disclose it in a timely manner under Rule 16. The agreement was produced after the close of the Government's case, potentially prejudicing the Government. The Government argues that the defendant's untimely disclosure violates her Rule 16 obligations and that the agreement should be excluded.
Court Filing: 672
Ghislaine Maxwell's lawyers submit a letter objecting to the characterization of certain individuals as 'victims' of the counts of conviction, arguing they do not qualify as statutory victims under the CVRA. The letter disputes that the individuals were minors at the time of alleged abuse, that the alleged abuse occurred during the period alleged in the indictment, and that they were directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense.
Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 719
The defense is arguing that the 1996 Agreement for Sale of 44 Kinnerton Street is admissible as impeachment evidence against Kate, a prosecution witness, as it contradicts her testimony about visiting Ghislaine Maxwell's home in 1994. The prosecution is objecting to the introduction of this evidence, claiming that the defense failed to disclose it in a timely manner.
Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 667
The letter, written by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, argues that [REDACTED - Survivor] and [REDACTED - Survivor] do not qualify as 'crime victims' under the CVRA because their alleged victimization occurred after the conduct underlying the offenses charged against Maxwell ended in 2004. The letter requests that the court clarify who will be permitted to speak at the sentencing proceeding.
court filing: 681
The US Attorney's office submitted a motion filed by Kate's attorney, accompanying her impact statement, in response to the court's order in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The submission was made by Damian Williams, US Attorney, and several Assistant US Attorneys. The document was filed with the court and copied to defense counsel.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.