Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 699
The letter, written by Laura A. Menninger on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, objects to certain redactions proposed by the government in their Omnibus Response and Exhibit 5, arguing that they are not justified and that the documents are 'judicial documents' subject to public access rights. The defense proposes alternative redactions and requests the court to publicly docket the Response with certain exceptions.
Summary
The letter, written by Laura A. Menninger on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, objects to certain redactions proposed by the government in their Omnibus Response and Exhibit 5, arguing that they are not justified and that the documents are 'judicial documents' subject to public access rights. The defense proposes alternative redactions and requests the court to publicly docket the Response with certain exceptions.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Related Documents (6)
EFTA00016726
court filing: 245
The letter is from Laura A. Menninger, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, to Judge Alison J. Nathan, discussing proposed redactions to pleadings related to a Rule 17(c) subpoena. The redactions are sought to protect the privacy of a third-party witness mentioned in documents marked 'Confidential' by the government. BSF takes no position on the necessity of the proposed redactions.
Court Filing - Notice of Electronic Filing: 21-2
The document is a notice of electronic filing from the US District Court, Southern District of New York, indicating that the appeal record in USA v. Maxwell has been transmitted to the US Court of Appeals. It includes details about the case, the charges against Ghislaine Maxwell, and the attorneys involved. The case involves charges of conspiracy, enticement, and transportation of minors for illegal sex acts, among others.
Court Transcript: 745
The transcript is from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, discussing legal issues such as the admissibility of a photograph as impeachment evidence and the disclosure requirements under Rule 16. The judge and lawyers debate the nuances of impeachment by contradiction and the application of Rule 608.
Court Filing - Notice of Electronic Filing: 5-2
This is a Notice of Electronic Filing from the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, indicating that the appeal record in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell has been electronically sent to the U.S. Court of Appeals. The document lists the parties involved, their attorneys, and the charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. It also includes details about the electronic filing and notification process.
Court Filing: 63207
Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team requested an adjournment of a hearing on her Motion for New Trial due to their unavailability. The court denied the request, citing that two of her four attorneys could attend and that the public interest favored a prompt hearing.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.