deposition: A-5785
The deponent, Edelstein, testifies about their conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1, Catherine M. Conrad, and the investigation into her background. Edelstein assumed Conrad was telling the truth about her education and background during voir dire, and did not ask Trzaskoma for underlying documents supporting her concerns. The conversation highlights potential issues with the juror's identity and the handling of the investigation.
Summary
The deponent, Edelstein, testifies about their conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1, Catherine M. Conrad, and the investigation into her background. Edelstein assumed Conrad was telling the truth about her education and background during voir dire, and did not ask Trzaskoma for underlying documents supporting her concerns. The conversation highlights potential issues with the juror's identity and the handling of the investigation.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (1)
Related Documents (6)
deposition: Case 1:20-cr-00336-PAE Document 616-2 Filed 08/24/22 Page 79 of 130
The witness, Brune, testifies about their involvement in preparing a letter dated July 21st and their recollection of events related to the waiver issue. Brune clarifies that they did not meet with Trzaskoma and Edelstein to prepare for the hearing, but had discussed the issues with them previously. The testimony highlights the witness's understanding of the significance of certain documents and emails.
deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-03303-PAE
The deposition transcript shows Edelstein being questioned about their knowledge of an investigation conducted by Theresa Trzaskoma and the accuracy of a statement regarding when the investigation began. Edelstein's testimony appears to be inconsistent, and they are pressed to clarify their answers.
deposition: A-5807
The deponent, Edelstein, discusses the drafting of a brief and clarifies that the wording was not intended to convey a specific meaning regarding waiver, but rather to establish that two individuals were the same person. Edelstein explains their discussion with Ms. Brune about omitting certain information from the brief.
Deposition Transcript: A-5804
The deposition of Ms. Edelstein discusses the accuracy of statements in a court brief, specifically regarding the defendants' investigation into Catherine Conrad and their awareness of an Appellate Division suspension report. Edelstein confirms the accuracy of a statement in the brief but is questioned about the timing and extent of the investigation. The transcript highlights potential inconsistencies in the defendants' claims.
deposition transcript: A-5796
The witness, Edelstein, is being questioned about their investigation and computer research related to Catherine Conrad. The questioning focuses on what information was known on May 12th and whether certain research could have been done at that time. The witness's responses indicate some discrepancies in their previous statements.
deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-03308-PAE Document 61602 Filed 02/24/22 Page 119 of 130
The deposition transcript shows Ms. Edelstein being questioned about statements made in a court brief, specifically regarding the defendants' knowledge and investigation into Catherine Conrad. Edelstein confirms the accuracy of certain statements while also revealing her awareness of Theresa Trzaskoma's discovery of the Appellate Division suspension report.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.