transcript of a legal discussion or deposition: A-5905

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP SUBMISSION TO THE OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Jeffrey Epstein, a successful businessman and noted philanthropist with no prior criminal record, has been investigated for potential violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591, 2422(b) and 2423(b). Since the limited review conducted by CEOS, two Supreme Court decisions—one authored by Justice Scalia and the other by Justice Thomas—have revitalized the bedrock principles that federal criminal statutes must be narrowly construed, that they may not be stretched to federalize conduct not clearly covered by their prohibitions, and that whenever there are two plausible constructions of a criminal statute, the narrower construction (hich safeguards liberty) rather than the broader construction (which expands the federal prosecutor's arsenal) controls under the venerable rule of lenity. Mr. Epstein's conduct—including his misconduct—falls within the heartland of historic state po

court transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616620 Filed 02/24/22 Page 63 of 117

The document appears to be a transcript of a legal discussion or argument, focusing on whether the actions of the Brune law firm on May 12, 2011, constituted a 'strategic judgment'. The speaker analyzes the concept of strategic judgment, referencing the Second Circuit and Justice Stevens' dissent, to determine if the firm's actions were a deliberate choice or oversight.

EFTA00013811

Rights and Procedures Under the Crime Victims' Rights Act and New Federal

Gerald Ford recounts dinner conversation about Justice Stevens and Nixon pardon

Gerald Ford recounts dinner conversation about Justice Stevens and Nixon pardon The passage is a personal recollection with no new factual claims, financial details, or actionable leads. It merely repeats known historical information about Ford's view of his own pardon of Nixon and his opinion of Justice Stevens, offering no novel or investigative value. Key insights: Ford described his pardon of Nixon as the decision that cost him reelection.; Ford praised Justice John Paul Stevens as a great, non‑ideological justice.

From: White Collar Law360 <news-alt@law360.com>

From: White Collar Law360 <news-alt@law360.com> To: Subject: 'Everybody In The Crosshairs' As DOJ Opioid Blitz Gets Real Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 07:45:15 +0000 1D-aw360 White Collar WHITE COLLAR Monday, July 22, 2019 Follow Law360 TOP NEWS Analysis 'Everybody In The Crosshairs' As DOJ Opioid Blitz Gets Real The U.S. Department of Justice's newest indictment of a painkiller distributor and its executives strongly suggests that the agency has embarked on a calculated criminal crackdown after years of civil enforcement failed to ease the opioid epidemic. Indictment attached I Read full article » Craig Won't Use Ukraine Report From Judge's Firm At Trial Ex-Skadden partner Gregory Craig indicated Friday he didn't want to introduce at his upcoming trial a Ukraine-focused report authored by lawyers at the former firm of the D.C. federal judge overseeing his criminal case. Read full article » Rep. Asks Feds If DOJ Policy Shielded Trump From Indictment The head of the Hous