court transcript: A-5921
The transcript captures a court hearing where the prosecutor, Ms. Davis, argues that the defense team intentionally concealed information about a juror and discusses the prejudice to the defendant, Mr. Parse, highlighting the evidence of his involvement in corrupt activities.
Summary
The transcript captures a court hearing where the prosecutor, Ms. Davis, argues that the defense team intentionally concealed information about a juror and discusses the prejudice to the defendant, Mr. Parse, highlighting the evidence of his involvement in corrupt activities.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Related Documents (6)
transcript of a court hearing or deposition: A-5920
The document discusses the defense's decision not to disclose information about a juror during voir dire or after an investigation, and the government's argument that this was a tactical choice that cannot form the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel. The defense considered several alternatives but chose to do nothing. The government's view is that this conscious and deliberate choice was a strategic decision.
Court Transcript: 6163/20
The transcript captures the prosecution's argument that defendant Parse's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is unfounded, as his defense team made strategic choices regarding Juror No. 1/Catherine Conrad, and that the evidence shows Parse was aware of and involved in the tax shelter transactions.
court transcript: A-5835
The court requests briefing on the implications of granting a new trial and the potential for interlocutory appeal by defendant Parse. Counsel clarifies the court's question, focusing on the possibility of an interlocutory appeal before sentencing.
court transcript: 6168/20
The transcript captures a court hearing where the prosecutor, Ms. Davis, argues that the defense made a strategic decision not to disclose information about a juror, and that this decision cannot form the basis of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. The government also presents evidence of the defendant's involvement in the alleged crimes, highlighting his role in orchestrating complex transactions.
transcript of a court hearing or oral argument: A-5914
The document is a transcript of an oral argument where an attorney, Mr. Shechtman, is discussing the ineffective assistance of counsel and prejudice prong in a case involving multiple defendants and allegations of backdating. He argues that the government's case focused on backdating, but the evidence shows a more complex situation. The attorney compares his client's situation to that of another defendant, Mr. Brubaker.
court transcript: A-5918
The document is a court transcript where MS. DAVIS argues that Mr. Parse's attorney made strategic choices that benefited him, and that MR. SHECHTMAN has not met the Strickland standard for ineffective assistance of counsel. The court had previously ruled on a motion for a new trial related to Catherine Conrad, a juror who was known to the defendant's law firm, Brune & Richard.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.