court filing: Case 12030600320
The document discusses Ghislaine Maxwell's potential cooperation with authorities and the implications of her defense strategy. It also highlights violations of Rule 23.1 by David Boies, counsel for one of Maxwell's accusers, who made public comments about the case. The document suggests that Maxwell's defense may be seen as 'blame the victim' and could potentially enrage a jury.
Summary
The document discusses Ghislaine Maxwell's potential cooperation with authorities and the implications of her defense strategy. It also highlights violations of Rule 23.1 by David Boies, counsel for one of Maxwell's accusers, who made public comments about the case. The document suggests that Maxwell's defense may be seen as 'blame the victim' and could potentially enrage a jury.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Related Documents (6)
EFTA00023053
Subject: The Sisters Who First Tried to Take Down Jeffrey Epstein
From: To: Cc: Subject: The Sisters Who First Tried to Take Down Jeffrey Epstein Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 15:30:42 +0000 The Sisters Who First Tried to Take Down Jeffrey Epstein NYT By Mike Baker 8/26/19 As more women have come forward in recent days to describe assaults at the hands of Jeffrey Epstein, finds herself distraught, wondering what might have happened if someone had taken her seriously. Twenty-four years ago, Ms. was an artist who had entered the unorthodox life Mr. Epstein lived behind the doors of his luxury estates. Mr. Epstein had offered to help her painting career, but it all came to an abrupt end one night in the summer of 1996, when she says Mr. Epstein and his companion, Ghislaine Maxwell, began violently groping her. She learned later that her M ,IM had been subjected to a troubling topless massage at Mr. Epstein's ranch in New Mexico. 111=ontacted the New York Police Department, and said she then went to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, offe
EFTA00011452
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 92 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 22
Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - KEIR STARMER - HUMAN RIGHTS AND BRITISH
From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - KEIR STARMER - HUMAN RIGHTS AND BRITISH DEMOCRACY Thu, 03 Apr 2025 09:08:24 #0000 Importance: Normal IMG_6895.Meg; IMG_6923.jpeg KEIR, DON'T YOU THINK ITS TIME THE BRITISH PUBLIC DESERVE TO KNOW THE TRUTH?? JOBS ARE GOING TO BE LOST..... THE BRITISH PUBLIC THAT VOTED YOU IN DESERVE TO KNOW THE TRUTH, OR IS BRITAIN NO LONGER A DEMOCRACY?? IF SO, AT LEAST BE HONEST ABOUT IT!!! THEY NEED TO KNOW ESPECIALLY AFTER IT WAS YOU WHILE PUBLICALLY CALLED DOR PRINCE ANDREW TO BE INVESTIGATED IN THE FIRST PLACE!! lifipaiLvanLiodosmdsolaukam pokialslamiraptoralimirmxspalgimpolire-b/47171611ml KEIR WHO ARE YOU PROTECTING?? REMEBER I RELINQUISHED MY BRITISH CITIZENSHIP BECAUSE OF THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT!! WHO ARE YOU PROTECTING!!! EFTA00144082 11:06* .a 1`. 0—> Post t KeirStarmerO @KeirStarmer There will be an economic impact from the decisions the US has taken. ••• We will continue to negotiate on a deal in our interests. Decisions will b
COHEN & GRESSER LLP
GG COHEN & GRESSER LLP Christian R. Evercle11 +1 (212) 957-7600 ccvcrdclIgathcngresscr.com October 13, 2020 BY EMAIL. , Esq. Esq. Esq. United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear 000 Thud Avenue New Yoek. NY 10022 +1 212 957 7600 phone owswoohensresser corn We write on behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to set forth requests for discovery and Brady material. Based on our review of the government's productions of August 5, 2019, August 13, 2019, and August 21, 2020, we make the following requests for discovery, inspection, and copying, in accordance with the guarantees of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and such other laws and rules as may be applicable. We are still reviewing these productions, as well as the government's most recent production of
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.