Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-8616Court UnsealedLegal Filing

court filing: Case 1:20-cr-00830-PAE Document 178 Filed 03/27/22 Page 26 of 26

The court rules that there was no constructive amendment in the defendant's trial, as the jury instructions, evidence, and government's summation captured the 'core of criminality' of the offense. The court agrees with the District Court's handling of a jury note and its direction to the jury. The decision relies on precedent from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: case 1:20-cr-00830-pae document 178 filed 03/27/22 page 26 of 26
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The court rules that there was no constructive amendment in the defendant's trial, as the jury instructions, evidence, and government's summation captured the 'core of criminality' of the offense. The court agrees with the District Court's handling of a jury note and its direction to the jury. The decision relies on precedent from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
Browse epstein-docs ArchiveFile: case 1:20-cr-00830-pae document 178 filed 03/27/22 page 26 of 26
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.