Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-8634Court UnsealedLegal Filing

court filing: Case 1:20-cv-06539-JPC Document 185-1 Filed 03/22/21 Page 17 of 20

The document discusses Schulte's challenge to the jury selection process, arguing that it violates the Sixth Amendment and the Equal Protection clause due to underrepresentation of African Americans and Hispanic Americans. The court rejects these claims, citing the lack of proof of discriminatory intent and failure to establish a prima facie violation. The court relies on precedents such as Rioux and Castaneda in its decision.

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: case 1:20-cv-06539-jpc document 185-1 filed 03/22/21 page 17 of 20
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document discusses Schulte's challenge to the jury selection process, arguing that it violates the Sixth Amendment and the Equal Protection clause due to underrepresentation of African Americans and Hispanic Americans. The court rejects these claims, citing the lack of proof of discriminatory intent and failure to establish a prima facie violation. The court relies on precedents such as Rioux and Castaneda in its decision.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
Browse epstein-docs ArchiveFile: case 1:20-cv-06539-jpc document 185-1 filed 03/22/21 page 17 of 20
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.