Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-8659Court UnsealedLegal Filing

court filing: Case 2:17-cr-00365-JMA Document 1859 Filed 03/22/21 Page 11 of 20

The court rejects Schulte's contention that the relevant community for his fair cross-section challenge is the Manhattan counties or the entire District, instead concluding that the White Plains counties are the relevant community. The court also finds that the government's decision to seek the indictment from White Plains was proper. The ruling is based on the precedent set in United States v. Bahna.

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: case 2:17-cr-00365-jma document 1859 filed 03/22/21 page 11 of 20
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The court rejects Schulte's contention that the relevant community for his fair cross-section challenge is the Manhattan counties or the entire District, instead concluding that the White Plains counties are the relevant community. The court also finds that the government's decision to seek the indictment from White Plains was proper. The ruling is based on the precedent set in United States v. Bahna.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
Browse epstein-docs ArchiveFile: case 2:17-cr-00365-jma document 1859 filed 03/22/21 page 11 of 20
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.