Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-8664Court UnsealedLegal Filing

court filing: Case 4:20-cr-00354-PAE Document 1359 Filed 03/22/21 Page 16 of 20

The court rejects Schulte's claims that the Jury Plan violates the Sixth Amendment due to systematic exclusion, citing various reasons including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the use of voter registration lists. The court relies on precedent, such as Rioux and Schanbarger, to support its conclusions. The defendant's allegations regarding the Jury Plan's replenishment period and exclusion of 'inactive voters' are also dismissed.

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: case 4:20-cr-00354-pae document 1359 filed 03/22/21 page 16 of 20
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The court rejects Schulte's claims that the Jury Plan violates the Sixth Amendment due to systematic exclusion, citing various reasons including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the use of voter registration lists. The court relies on precedent, such as Rioux and Schanbarger, to support its conclusions. The defendant's allegations regarding the Jury Plan's replenishment period and exclusion of 'inactive voters' are also dismissed.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
Browse epstein-docs ArchiveFile: case 4:20-cr-00354-pae document 1359 filed 03/22/21 page 16 of 20
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.