Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-8684Court UnsealedLegal Filing

court filing: Case:20-17-00-8854-APD Document:1859 Filed:03/22/21 Page:13 of 20

The document discusses a court case where the defendant, Schulte, challenges the indictment obtained from White Plains, arguing that the relevant community is the district or division where the trial will be held. The court distinguishes this case from United States v. Johnson and applies the absolute disparity method to analyze underrepresentation.

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: case:20-17-00-8854-apd document:1859 filed:03/22/21 page:13 of 20
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document discusses a court case where the defendant, Schulte, challenges the indictment obtained from White Plains, arguing that the relevant community is the district or division where the trial will be held. The court distinguishes this case from United States v. Johnson and applies the absolute disparity method to analyze underrepresentation.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
Browse epstein-docs ArchiveFile: case:20-17-00-8854-apd document:1859 filed:03/22/21 page:13 of 20

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.