Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-8686Court UnsealedLegal Filing

court filing: Case:20-cr-117-00:3834EAC Document#:1859 Filed:03/22/21 Page:15 of 20

The document argues that Schulte's fair cross-section challenge fails because he cannot meet the third Duren element: systematic exclusion. It explains that systematic exclusion requires underrepresentation due to the jury selection system itself, not external forces. The government's choice of venue is not considered systematic exclusion.

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: case:20-cr-117-00:3834eac document#:1859 filed:03/22/21 page:15 of 20
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document argues that Schulte's fair cross-section challenge fails because he cannot meet the third Duren element: systematic exclusion. It explains that systematic exclusion requires underrepresentation due to the jury selection system itself, not external forces. The government's choice of venue is not considered systematic exclusion.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
Browse epstein-docs ArchiveFile: case:20-cr-117-00:3834eac document#:1859 filed:03/22/21 page:15 of 20

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.