court filing/news article excerpt: DOJ-OGR-00009183
The document describes how the Ghislaine Maxwell jury deliberated and reached a verdict, and also discusses a court hearing in a related lawsuit involving Prince Andrew, where the judge appeared dismissive of Andrew's defense arguments.
Summary
The document describes how the Ghislaine Maxwell jury deliberated and reached a verdict, and also discusses a court hearing in a related lawsuit involving Prince Andrew, where the judge appeared dismissive of Andrew's defense arguments.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing: DOJ-OGR-00009862
The document discusses the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, focusing on the jury deliberation process as described by a juror named Scotty. It also touches on a lawsuit against Prince Andrew, with Judge Kaplan appearing skeptical of Andrew's defense. The document was filed on March 28, 2022.
news article: doj-ogr-00009861
The article discusses juror Scotty's account of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial deliberations, revealing that the jury struggled with the complex instructions and that the defense's aggressive questioning of victims did not sway them. It also touches on Prince Andrew's court hearing, where his lawyers faced tough questioning from the judge.
Prince Andrew- Process server's affidavit
Case 1:21-cv-06702-LAK Document 10 Filed 09/10/21 Page 1 of 32 Case 1:21-cv-06702-LAK Document 10 Filed 09/10/21 Page 2 of 32 Case 1:21-cv-06702-LAK Document 10 Filed 09/10/21 Page 3 of 32 Case 1:21-cv-06702-LAK Document 10 Filed 09/10/21 Page 4 of 32 Case 1:21-cv-06702-LAK Document 10 Filed 09/10/21 Page 5 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, CASE NO: v. PRINCE ANDREW, DUKE OF YORK, a/k/a ANDREW ALBERT CHRISTIA
5(19/22, 3:52 PM SEA At. "250SC. fktmct
5(19/22, 3:52 PM SEA At. "250SC. fktmct JcereY Epsteh - Wildpedla Epstein a massage". She claims she was taken to his mansion, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with her, and paid her $200 immediately afterward.1io61 A similar $50-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer.E•g-91 These and several similar lawsuits were dismissed.1139-) All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of court' ll Epstein made many art-pl-atirt r s_ettlements with alleged victims.W23 - - - _ E_XCAt "-Vet 5sE RItACt PnOi- CiOR °NICER • - 40L'aritfrieerPROS1 1701-i0.Ni o> SIE•us) i1/44".,e036( C ; Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, November 30, 2018. Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014)*SC7ck%A L. ne,OSC Rt p Rom N)Eiszci poS IT c"),3 A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe 1 ([REDACTED - Survivor]) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Vi
Subject: SDNY News Clips, Wednesday, February 5, 2020
From: To: Subject: SDNY News Clips, Wednesday, February 5, 2020 Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 22:11:23 +0000 Attachments: 02-05-2020.pdf SDNY News Clips Wednesday, February 5, 2020 EFTA00095936 Contents Public Corruption Epstein Parnas Avenatti Securities and Commodities Fraud Blaszczak Madoff Civil NYCHA Terrorism and International Narcotics Schulte White Plains Da Silva Complex Frauds and Cybercrime Mark Scott Matters of Interest Weinstein Public Corruption Epstein Epstein accusers and Harry Dunn's family plea for UK-US cooperation The Hill By Caroline Davies 2/5/2020 The family of teenage motorcyclist Harry Dunn and the alleged victims of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein have united to put pressure on Anne Sacoolas and the Duke of York to "co-operate with law enforcement". Lisa Bloom, lawyer for six alleged Epstein victims, and Radd Seiger, spokesman for the parents of Dunn, 19, joined forces on Wednesday to call for Sacoolas to return to the UK, and f
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) GIIISLAINE MAXWE 'S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON. M R AN & FOREMAN P.C. Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim Attorneys for Chislaine Maxwell EFTA00155901 Table of Contents Table of Contents ii Table of Authorities iv Introduction 1 Factual Background 2 I. Jury Selection. 2 A. The jury questionnaire. 2 B. Juror No. 50's questionnaire. 5 C. Juror No. 50's voir dire 6 D. The final composition of the jury. 9 II. Juror No. 50's admissions that he wasn't truthful with the Court 11 A. Juror No. 50's statements to the media. 12 1. The interview with the Independent. 12 2. The interview with the Daily Mail. 13 3. The interview with Reuters 14 4. The partial video of the interview with the Daily Mail. 1
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.