Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-9100Dept. of JusticeLegal Filing

Court Filing: DOJ-OGR-00021862

The court discusses the application of 18 U.S.C. § 3283 to the defendant's case, rejecting a categorical approach in favor of a case-specific approach, and determines that Counts Three and Four qualify as offenses involving the sexual abuse of a minor. The court also addresses Maxwell's argument that the statute of limitations bars certain counts, citing Landgraf v. USI Film Products.

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
File: doj-ogr-00021862
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The court discusses the application of 18 U.S.C. § 3283 to the defendant's case, rejecting a categorical approach in favor of a case-specific approach, and determines that Counts Three and Four qualify as offenses involving the sexual abuse of a minor. The court also addresses Maxwell's argument that the statute of limitations bars certain counts, citing Landgraf v. USI Film Products.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (1)

Browse epstein-docs ArchiveFile: doj-ogr-00021862
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.