Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-9104Dept. of JusticeLegal Filing

Court Filing: DOJ-OGR-00021867

The document discusses Maxwell's appeal of the District Court's denial of their motion claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance. The court reviews the denial de novo and affirms the District Court's decision, finding that Maxwell's arguments regarding constructive amendment and prejudicial variance are without merit. The court holds that the indictment contained the necessary elements of the offense charged and fairly informed Maxwell of the charges.

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
File: doj-ogr-00021867
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document discusses Maxwell's appeal of the District Court's denial of their motion claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance. The court reviews the denial de novo and affirms the District Court's decision, finding that Maxwell's arguments regarding constructive amendment and prejudicial variance are without merit. The court holds that the indictment contained the necessary elements of the offense charged and fairly informed Maxwell of the charges.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (1)

Browse epstein-docs ArchiveFile: doj-ogr-00021867
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.