Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-9106Dept. of JusticeLegal Filing

court filing: DOJ-OGR-00021869

The document argues that Maxwell's conviction did not result from a constructive amendment or prejudicial variance between the indictment and trial evidence, as the evidence at trial substantially corresponded to the indictment and did not prejudice Maxwell.

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
File: doj-ogr-00021869
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document argues that Maxwell's conviction did not result from a constructive amendment or prejudicial variance between the indictment and trial evidence, as the evidence at trial substantially corresponded to the indictment and did not prejudice Maxwell.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (1)

Browse epstein-docs ArchiveFile: doj-ogr-00021869

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.