Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-940House OversightOther

The document appears to be a juror questionnaire for Juror ID: 50, asking about their experiences an...

The document appears to be a juror questionnaire for Juror ID: 50, asking about their experiences and potential biases. The juror's responses are not visible in the provided snippet. The questionnaire is related to a court case with the number 2020-0000000-AEN.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-940
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document appears to be a juror questionnaire for Juror ID: 50, asking about their experiences and potential biases. The juror's responses are not visible in the provided snippet. The questionnaire is related to a court case with the number 2020-0000000-AEN.

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

Juror's impartialityJuror's experience with subpoenasJuror's experience with crime
0Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

11 MAY 25-MAY 27 901_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Irons, Janet Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11-29 AM To: Richard C. Smith Cc: Jeffrey T. We Subject: Meeting with Prison Society tomorrow Hello Warden Smith, I'm writing in preparation for our meeting with you and Director Hite tomorrow at 9:30 to talk about the Law Library. We have been in touch with Kim Kelmor, Assistant Director ofthe Law Library at Penn State, who has experience with prison libraries. She has helpfully provided us with some questions and guida

186p
Court UnsealedDepositionApr 2, 2022

USA vs. Ghislaine Maxwell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, –v– Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (AJN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation: Central to our system of justice is a defendant’s right to have guilt adjudged by a lay jury of one’s peers. Citizens give their time and attention to this critical role in the administration of justice, a role which is enshrined in our Constitution. Judicial officers are charged with t

40p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01659028

0p
Court UnsealedFeb 25, 2022

Maxwell 2.25.22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, - v￾Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: USDC SONY DOCUMENT EL£CTRONICA1.LY FILED DOC#: __ --=--,....,..,,,,..,,.-- Di\TE t'lLED: 2/24/22 20-CR-330 (AJN) OPINION & ORDER Before the Comi is the Defendant's motion for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33, which the Government opposes. See Maxwell Br., Jan. 19, 2022; Gov. Br., Feb. 2, 2022. The Defen

21p
Dept. of JusticeJul 10, 2024

2006 Jeffrey Epstein grand jury

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2019-CA-014681-AG CA FLORIDA HOLDINGS, LLC, Publisher of THE PALM BEACH POST, Plaintiff, vs. JOSEPH ABRUZZO, as Clerk and Comptroller of Palm Beach County, Florida, Defendants. _________________________________/ ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE TRIAL COURT’S FEBRUARY 29, 2024 ORDER AND CANCELING JULY 8, 2024 HEARING THIS CAUSE, having come before t

176p
Court UnsealedOtherUnknown

Juror Questionnaire: 2020-cv-00000000-JN Document 6423-11 Filed 03/21/22 Page 515 of 830

Juror ID 50 responded to a questionnaire regarding their ability to serve as a fair and impartial juror. They indicated no association with the NYPD and no opinion that would make it difficult to be impartial regarding the U.S. Attorney's Office.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.