Juror ID 50 responded to a questionnaire regarding their ability to serve as a fair and impartial ju...
Juror ID 50 responded to a questionnaire regarding their ability to serve as a fair and impartial juror. They indicated no association with the NYPD and no opinion that would make it difficult to be impartial regarding the U.S. Attorney's Office.
Summary
Juror ID 50 responded to a questionnaire regarding their ability to serve as a fair and impartial juror. They indicated no association with the NYPD and no opinion that would make it difficult to be impartial regarding the U.S. Attorney's Office.
Tags
Related Documents (6)
11 MAY 25-MAY 27 901_Redacted.pdf
Kristen M. Simkins From: Irons, Janet Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11-29 AM To: Richard C. Smith Cc: Jeffrey T. We Subject: Meeting with Prison Society tomorrow Hello Warden Smith, I'm writing in preparation for our meeting with you and Director Hite tomorrow at 9:30 to talk about the Law Library. We have been in touch with Kim Kelmor, Assistant Director ofthe Law Library at Penn State, who has experience with prison libraries. She has helpfully provided us with some questions and guida
The document appears to be a juror questionnaire for Juror ID: 50, asking about their experiences an...
The document appears to be a juror questionnaire for Juror ID: 50, asking about their experiences and potential biases. The juror's responses are not visible in the provided snippet. The questionnaire is related to a court case with the number 2020-0000000-AEN.
USA vs. Ghislaine Maxwell
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, –v– Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (AJN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation: Central to our system of justice is a defendant’s right to have guilt adjudged by a lay jury of one’s peers. Citizens give their time and attention to this critical role in the administration of justice, a role which is enshrined in our Constitution. Judicial officers are charged with t
EFTA Document EFTA01659028
Maxwell 2.25.22
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, - vGhislaine Maxwell, Defendant. ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: USDC SONY DOCUMENT EL£CTRONICA1.LY FILED DOC#: __ --=--,....,..,,,,..,,.-- Di\TE t'lLED: 2/24/22 20-CR-330 (AJN) OPINION & ORDER Before the Comi is the Defendant's motion for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33, which the Government opposes. See Maxwell Br., Jan. 19, 2022; Gov. Br., Feb. 2, 2022. The Defen
Juror Questionnaire: 2020-cv-00000000-JN Document 6423-11 Filed 03/21/22 Page 515 of 830
Juror ID 50 responded to a questionnaire regarding their ability to serve as a fair and impartial juror. They indicated no association with the NYPD and no opinion that would make it difficult to be impartial regarding the U.S. Attorney's Office.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.