email: DOJ-OGR-00024288

EFTA Document EFTA01658887

EFTA Document EFTA01340354

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/05/2020 12:59 Pb NYSCEF DOC. NO. 113 INDEX NO. 159224/2016 RECEIVEDg e NYSCEF: 03/05/2020 Pa 1 April 9, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK SHELDON BARR and THOMAS GARDNER, Plaintiffs, -against- CITY OF NEW YORK and 116 EAST 65TH STREET, LLC, Defendants, INDEX NO.: 159225/2010 535 Fifth Avenue New York, New York April 9, 2019 10:07 a.m. X X 1 EXAMINATION BEFORE TRIAL of the Defendant, 116 EAST 65TH STREET, LLC, b

EFTA Document EFTA01306406

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/05/2020 12:59 P?' NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1:2 INDEX NO. 159224/2016 RECEIVEDg e NYSCEF: 03/05/2020 Pa April 9, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK SHELDON BARR and THOMAS GARDNER, Plaintiffs, -against- CITY OF NEW YORK and 116 EAST 65TH STREET, LLC, Defendants, INDEX NO.: 159225/2010 535 Fifth Avenue New York, New York April 9, 2019 10:07 a.m. X X 1 EXAMINATION BEFORE TRIAL of the Defendant, 116 EAST 65TH STREET, LLC, by G

email: DOJ-OGR-00024392

The email discusses a CNN article criticizing the DOJ for providing incorrect information about Jeffrey Epstein's release, and clarifies that Epstein was indeed released from BOP custody. The email also includes links to various news articles about Epstein's death and the subsequent investigations.

Display Name

Display Name Email UUID 6ICE9350-0B4F-0000-AB39-E8Of'2A59A443 Distribution 'I've TO Recipient Type SysternGroupMember Recipient Display Name Email IRA D 9D77B2D0-19C1-0000-A9894Y2C00000S8D0 Distribution Type TO Recipient Tvpc SystemGroupkkmber Recipient Display Name Email _ U LID 4237CDC0-1407-0000-AF20-8402120084D2 Distribution Type TO Recipient Type _Recipient Display Name a Email UUID 66E64C10-1320-0000-8ECI-2F2162868DCC Distribution Type TO Recipient Txpe SystemGroupMember Expire 0 Delay delivers until 0 Delegated fake Archived fake Read fake Deleted fake Opened fake Completed fake Security Normal Box type Inbox Return notification hen opened fake Return notification "hen deleted fake Return notification when completed fake Return notification %%hen declined fake Return notification "hen accepted false Archive S'en ion 5.3 Internal ID 5D4F0066.NYMDOMLNYMADMI.100.16B6F30.1.F EAE. b@II.NYMDOM LNY MADM 1.103.0.1.0.141

(USANYS)"

From: (USANYS)" To: "MM, (USANYS) [Contractor]" <I a Subject: FW: Private and Confidential Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 19:18:41 +0000 S This is the email that forwarded to me for handling by us. Please let me know what you think is best approach that will give respect to the fact htat Ms. Sarnoff has been previously emailing her information to AG Barr directly and that also respects her efforts to be helpful. Thanks Fro To: William Barr Cc: Subject: Private and Confidential Dear Mr. Barr, In the Epstein case, one victim's testimony, describes how she was "trafficked" for sex. Given my understanding of that law, and under TVPA, the victim's testimony does not seem to match the criteria for sex trafficking. If I am correct, why are the courts allowing Ms. case to be defined as a child sex trafficking case? According to her testimony in the first complaint, Jane Doe 102 vs. Jeffrey Epstein, [filed May 1, 2009 in Southern District Fl] and later in a telephone interview