Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-999House OversightLegal Filing

Ghislaine Maxwell's reply memorandum argues that Counts One through Four of the superseding indictme...

Ghislaine Maxwell's reply memorandum argues that Counts One through Four of the superseding indictment should be dismissed as time-barred. The memorandum contests the retroactive application of the 2003 Amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3283 and asserts that the charged offenses do not fall under the statute's provisions.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-999
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ghislaine Maxwell's reply memorandum argues that Counts One through Four of the superseding indictment should be dismissed as time-barred. The memorandum contests the retroactive application of the 2003 Amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3283 and asserts that the charged offenses do not fall under the statute's provisions.

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

Statute of limitations for Mann Act countsRetroactivity of the 2003 Amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3283Applicability of 18 U.S.C. § 3283 to the charged offenses
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.