Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
dc-21172060Court Unsealed

Prince Andrew order 12.31.21

Case 1:21-cv-06702-LAK Document 61 Filed 12/31/21 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, -against- 21-cv-6702 (LAK) PRINCE ANDREW, Duke of York, in his personal capacity, also known as Andrew Albert Christian Edward, Defendant. X ORDER LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Defendant moves for an order compelling plaintiffto respond t o targeted" but as yet unspecified "written discovery requests pertaining to her domicile," requiring h

Date
December 31, 2021
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
dc-21172060
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Case 1:21-cv-06702-LAK Document 61 Filed 12/31/21 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, -against- 21-cv-6702 (LAK) PRINCE ANDREW, Duke of York, in his personal capacity, also known as Andrew Albert Christian Edward, Defendant. X ORDER LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Defendant moves for an order compelling plaintiffto respond t o targeted" but as yet unspecified "written discovery requests pertaining to her domicile," requiring h

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 1:21-cv-06702-LAK Document 61 Filed 12/31/21 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, -against- 21-cv-6702 (LAK) PRINCE ANDREW, Duke of York, in his personal capacity, also known as Andrew Albert Christian Edward, Defendant. X ORDER LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Defendant moves for an order compelling plaintiffto respond t o targeted" but as yet unspecified "written discovery requests pertaining to her domicile," requiring her "to submit to a two-hour remote deposition limited to the issue of her domicile," and staying all other discovery until the Court determines whether subject matter exists, lack of which wouid be a potential defense that the defendant refers to as "anticipated" and that he concededly has not actually raised. The motion (Dkt 58) is denied, substantially for the reasons set forth in the plaintiff's opposition to defendant's motion. Among other relevant points, it appears that the defendant previously served on the plaintiffextensive discovery, including at least one comprehensive request for documents relating to her domicile, to which responses are due, and have been promised, by January 14. See Dkt. 58-2, at 2. This ruling is without prejudice to any defense of lack of subjec t matter jurisdiction that defendant may raise by motion or by answer. Itlikewise is made without determining the merit, or lack of merit, in plaintiff's assertion that defendant's motion is "a transparent attempt to delay discovery into his own documents and testimony." Dkt. 60, at 2. SOORDERED. Dated: December 31, 2021 Lewis A. Kaplan United States District Judge

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #1:21-CV-06702-LAK

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01823003

2p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016521

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Edward Epstein <

1p
House OversightUnknown

Civil lawsuit alleges Epstein‑Maxwell sex‑trafficking scheme tied to federal plea negotiations and possible high‑level cover‑up

Civil lawsuit alleges Epstein‑Maxwell sex‑trafficking scheme tied to federal plea negotiations and possible high‑level cover‑up The passage provides concrete allegations from a civil complaint (named plaintiff Ransome) that Jeffrey Epstein recruited a young masseuse with promises of fashion‑design work, kept her passport, and forced sex with powerful figures. It links the timeline to a non‑prosecution agreement negotiated by federal prosecutors (including an unnamed Acosta) and notes that the deal quashed an FBI investigation. The mention of Prince Andrew, [REDACTED - Survivor], and potential involvement of senior DOJ officials gives actionable leads (names, dates, alleged transactions) that merit follow‑up, though the claims are unverified and rely on a single civil filing. Key insights: Ransome’s civil complaint (filed Jan 2017) alleges Epstein promised career help in exchange for sex and kept her passport.; Complaint ties alleged abuse to the period when Epstein’s lawyers were negotiating a non‑prosecution agreement with federal prosecutors (Acosta et al.).; The plea deal allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state prostitution charges, receive a private‑wing jail sentence, and allegedly halted an FBI probe into an international trafficking network.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Compilation of public links referencing Jeffrey Epstein and associated personalities

The passage merely aggregates publicly available web links and generic descriptions about Jeffrey Epstein, his foundation, and his alleged connections. It provides no new factual leads, specific trans List of URLs to Wikipedia, news articles, and promotional sites about Epstein. Mentions of known associates such as Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Leslie Wexne References to Epste

1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01385042

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.