Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
dc-21186731Court UnsealedDeposition

Ghislaine Maxwell unseal 1.26.22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, –v– Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-cr-330 (AJN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of Defendant’s motion for a new trial and accompanying exhibits, which she requests to file under seal. See Dkt. No. 580. The Court has also received requests from media organizations to unseal the motion. The Court is aware there is substantial public interest in this matter and will ensure that

Date
January 26, 2022
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
dc-21186731
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, –v– Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-cr-330 (AJN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of Defendant’s motion for a new trial and accompanying exhibits, which she requests to file under seal. See Dkt. No. 580. The Court has also received requests from media organizations to unseal the motion. The Court is aware there is substantial public interest in this matter and will ensure that

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, –v– Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-cr-330 (AJN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of Defendant’s motion for a new trial and accompanying exhibits, which she requests to file under seal. See Dkt. No. 580. The Court has also received requests from media organizations to unseal the motion. The Court is aware there is substantial public interest in this matter and will ensure that the First Amendment right to public access is fully safeguarded. At the same time, the Court must act deliberately and hear from the parties in considering these sealing issues in order to ensure the integrity of any potential inquiry process going forward, should one be ordered. That too is in the public, as well as the Defendant’s and the Government’s, interest. Accordingly, to the extent the Defense requests that arguments in favor of sealing should themselves be sealed, that request is DENIED. Arguments in favor of sealing can be made in such a way so as not to undermine the grounds for seeking sealing or redaction in the first instance. The Defense is therefore ORDERED to file a letter on the public docket on or before February 1, 2022, that justifies the proposed sealing by reference to the three-part test in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The Government may file on ECF a response to the Defense’s justification letter on or before February 4, 2022. 1/26/22 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 585 Filed 01/26/22 Page 1 of 2 The Government’s opposition to the Defense’s new trial motion is due February 2, 2022. Dkt. No. 571. Per the established practice in this case, the Government must provide a copy via email to the Defense to allow the Defense the opportunity to propose narrowly tailored redactions and/or sealing. If either party proposes redactions to or sealing of the Government’s anticipated opposition, a letter justifying such redactions or sealing must be filed on the public docket. The Defense letter must be filed on or before February 8, 2022, and the Government letter must be filed by February 11, 2022. The same process will apply for any Defense reply in support, which is due February 9, 2022. Dkt. No. 571. If redactions or sealing are proposed, the Defense letter justifying such requests would be due February 15, 2022, and the Government letter would be due February 18, 2022. The parties are FURTHER ORDERED to address the New York Times Company’s motion to unseal the filled-out questionnaires for the twelve seated jurors. See Dkt. No. 583. Letters by both parties must be submitted via ECF on or before February 11, 2022. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 26, 2022 New York, New York ____________________________________ ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 585 Filed 01/26/22 Page 2 of 2

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #1:20-CR-00330-AJN
Wire Refreference

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00031870

0p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 199

The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, responding to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding the superseding indictment. The government explains the timing of the superseding indictment and argues that it was not delayed for strategic advantage. The government also addresses the potential impact on the trial length and proposes measures to mitigate any delays.

8p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Court filing - Letter to the Judge: 362

The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 17 news media organizations urge the court to deny Ghislaine Maxwell's request to file the juror questionnaire and voir dire under seal, citing the First Amendment right of access to criminal proceedings and the presumption of openness in voir dire.

4p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 407

The document is a court filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel requesting the release of potential jurors' names to attorneys, citing concerns about the ability to conduct background research and ensure a fair trial. The filing references relevant case law and bar association opinions to support the request.

5p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court filings: 8

The documents include court filings related to the cases of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The first filing concerns the scheduling of Maxwell's arraignment and bail hearing, while the second is related to Epstein's bail motion and financial disclosure.

4p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00028774

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.