Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
dc-6199164Court Unsealed

Doe Jane II v Epstein

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JANE DOE II Plaintiff, ?52:96am vs. EPSTEIN, an" A RAH KELLEN, Defendants. 1 \l 80$ 1ch 0 Til" ?301 COMPLAINT Plaintiff, JANE DOE II, hereby sues JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, and states: JURISDICTION AND VENUE This is an action for damages in excess of $15,000, exclusive of interests and costs. Venue is proper in this Court as all acts occurred in Palm Beach County and all par

Date
July 15, 2019
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
dc-6199164
Pages
5
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JANE DOE II Plaintiff, ?52:96am vs. EPSTEIN, an" A RAH KELLEN, Defendants. 1 \l 80$ 1ch 0 Til" ?301 COMPLAINT Plaintiff, JANE DOE II, hereby sues JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, and states: JURISDICTION AND VENUE This is an action for damages in excess of $15,000, exclusive of interests and costs. Venue is proper in this Court as all acts occurred in Palm Beach County and all par

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JANE DOE II Plaintiff, ?52:96am vs. EPSTEIN, an" A RAH KELLEN, Defendants. 1 \l 80$ 1ch 0 Til" ?301 COMPLAINT Plaintiff, JANE DOE II, hereby sues JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, and states: JURISDICTION AND VENUE This is an action for damages in excess of $15,000, exclusive of interests and costs. Venue is proper in this Court as all acts occurred in Palm Beach County and all parties reside and/0r do business herein. PARTIES 4. Ms. DOE II is a natural person residing in Palm Beach County, Florida. During the events giving rise to this claim, she was a minor but has now reached majority. 5. Defendant EPSTEIN is a natural person who resides and/or does bu?iness in Palm Beach County, Florida, and who committed the acts alleged within the jurisdiction of Palm Beach County, Florida. Defendant KELLEN is believed to reside in the State of New York, but committed the acts alleged within the jurisdiction of Palm Beach County, Florida. 6. Defendant EPSTEIN is believed to now be incarcerated in the Palm Beach County Jail for crimes committed that are related and/or similar to the claims in this case. 7. Defendant EPSTEIN was, at all times relevant to this action, a part time resident of Palm Beach, Florida. All acts complained of herein occurred at his estate residence in Palm Beach, Florida. 8. Defendant EPSTEIN has a history of enticing young women, under the age of consent, to private sessions that begin with massages and evolve, through his acts of solicitation by use of his lavish wealth, into sexual encounters, wherein Defendant EPSTEIN ful?lls sexual fantasies by using said young women. 9. Defendant EPSTEIN, in agreement with two (2) persons he employed for this purpose, [REDACTED] and Defendant KELLEN, conspired with these other two Defendants to solicit young women of the type Defendant EPSTEIN preferred, blonde, attractive in appearance, and younger than the age of legal consent, to provide sexual grati?cation for him. 10. Defendants EPSTEIN and KELLEN entered into a'criminal conspiracy to solicit young women for acts of prostitution, including the Plaintiff. 11. From about June or July, 2008 until February, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN and KELLEN solicited the Plaintiff to come to Defendant home and provide ?massages? for him. Defendant EPSTEIN corrupted young girls, such as Plaintiff, into engaging in sexual acts to designed to ful?ll his unnatural sexual desires for young women or even younger girls who were under the age of consent. These acts included his requests that he wanted the encounter to be like a ?porn video.? Defendant EPSTEIN would script lines for Plaintiff to say, including calling out his name and requesting that he perform a certain sexual act ?harder,?while he touched the Plaintiffs vagina with a vibrator or with his ?ngers; alternately, he would masturbate in the presence of the Plaintiff after demanding her to disrobe and walk in front of him in provocative sexual poses. - 12. Defendant EPSTEIN touched Plaintiff vagina, or penetrated Plaintiffs vagina, using his ?ngers and/or a vibrator on multiple occasions, during the time that Plaintiff was a minor. COUNT I: SEXUAL BATTERY 13. Plaintiff reasserts and alleges, as if fully set forth in Count I, the allegations of 111] 1-12, ?1_1P_f? l4. Defendant EPSTEIN unlawfully touched the Plaintiff without Plaintiff? consent, and before she reached the age of consent, with the intention of bringing about a harmful and offensive contact. 15. As a direct and proximate result of said unlawful touching, plaintiff suffered physical injuries, severe emotional distress, mental anguish and distress, humiliation and embarrassment and continues to suffer so today. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court: A. Award Plaintiff compensatory damages for humiliation, loss of reputation, mental anguish and pain and suffering; and B. Award Plaintiff her costs of this action. COUNT II: CIVIL CONSPIRACY 16. Plaintiff reasserts and alleges, as if fully set forth in Count I, the allegations of 1111 1-12, supra. 17. Defendants entered into a criminal conspiracy to solicit young women for the sexual grati?cation of Defendant EPSTEIN, including, but not limited to, soliciting the Plaintiff and others like her for him to exploit and take advantage of their youth, inexperience and ?nancial need. 18. As a direct and proximate result of said unlawful touching, plaintiff suffered physical injuries, severe emotional distress, mental anguish and distress, humiliation and embarrassment and continues to suffer so today. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff reSpectfully requests that this Court: A. Award Plaintiff compensatory damages for humiliation, loss of reputation, mental anguish and pain and suffering; and B. Award Plaintiff her costs of this action. PLAINTIFF DEMANDS A JURY TRIAL ON ALL ISSUES SO TRIABLE. Dated: ?3.100? Respectfully submitted, 1513536 M. Florida Bar No.. 437883 GARCIA, ELKINS BOEHRINGER, PA. 224 Datura St., Ste. 900 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone: (561)832-8033 Telecopier: (561) 832-7137 E-mail: isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF Page: 1 I PALM BEACH CTY CIR CT JISPROD Receipt Nomber: CAMB227404 Date: Cashier: DLAFFERTY Payor: ISIDRO MANUEL GARCIA Addr: 224 DATURA ST #900 THE HARVEY BUILDING WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 Violation/Docket Description Amount Case: 2008CA020614 - JANE DOE II JEFFREY EPSTEIN Party: JANE DOE II CAFF 236.00 CAFF 20.00 CHECK RECEIVED GENERAL ACCT -256.00 Total Fees: 256.00 Total Payment: 256.00

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Emailisidrogarcia@bellsouth.net
Phone(561) 832-7137
Phone(561)832-8033

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

GRAND JURY PRESENTATION

GRAND JURY PRESENTATION OPERATION LEAP YEAR I. INTRODUCTION A. New Indictment 1. Summarize Changes 2. Summarize Current Charges 3. Review Law/Instructions 4. Go through legal allegations in introduction B. Summarize How the Evidence Will Be Presented 1. Chart 2. Break Overt Acts into Two Categories: a. Meetings/Sexual Activity — Grouped by victim — Testimony re Interviews with the Girls b. Flights — Manifests C. Take Questions D. Call Special Agent Kuyrkendall H. RETURN DOCUMENTS RECEIVED IN RESPONSE TO SUBPOENAS ISSUED SINCE THE LAST DOCUMENT RETURN. A. Have additional subpoenas been issued on behalf of this grand jury regarding Operation Leap Year? And have documents been received in response to those subpoenas? What subpoenas were issued and what items were received? Did you bring those records with you today? KUYRICENDALL SUBSTANTIVE TESTIMONY A. Hand out summary chart 1. Review renumbering of Jane Does a. S/A Kuyrkendall: Can you explain

77p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02729648

53p
Court UnsealedJan 4, 2024

Unsealed Jeffrey Epstein court papers

January 3, 2024 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Pursuant to the Court’s December 18, 2023, unsealing order, and following conferral with Defendant, Plaintiff files this set of documents ordered unsealed. The filing of these documents ordered unsealed will be done on a rolling basis until c

943p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01689427

100p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.