Case File
efta-01356611DOJ Data Set 10OtherEFTA01356611
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01356611
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
•
Effective 11 August, 2016 - As per HRM policy, whenever there is an email with PDF attachment for instruction it will be
considered as FAX.
•
FO is required to attach email along with PDF attachment where ever there is a call back performed. (Reason: To validate
segregation of duties), in case FO has not attached email, teas will be rejected back.
•
Team will identify the document as if it is received via FAX or by email with help of encrypted line from fax machine on the
top/bottom of document (date, time, fax number). If encrypted line is present, it means document is received via fax machine
and if encrypted line is not present it might have received through email and TAG team will need email to validate call back
signatures.
•
Effective 1 September,2016 - Recipient of email can forward the email but the person who forwards the email CANNOT do
the callback.
•
Effective 1 September,2016 - List mailbox are created in which client will be sending instructions to a list id in which
recipients are added, whose list will be maintained by TAG team and TAG will make sure the client email recipient list
members only do the recipient signature and callback signature on the callback stamp. Currently we have only one List
information which is DBPrivateBankChicago and the members of the list are "Dana.zook@db.com, Janet.sible@db.com and
Valerie.oconnor@db.com".
Use link to check DB list members: http://dbIng.mail.db.com/
•
Effective 22 September,2016 - New list mailbox was created which is "Teamburnettpwmla" and the members of the team are
Daniel Kay, Israel Velasquez, Mayra Fonseca, Melissa Clark and Susan Burnett.
•
Effective 1 March, 2018 - If Banker is out of office or not able to access his/her mail box due to any reason who actually received instruction from the
client, in such case his/her colleague(another banker) can forward that client"s mail to his own mailbox as he/she has access of each other mail box. Such
banker or the banker who actually received email directly from the client, can only be the call back recipient. both of them can not perform the call back.
Example : If "Joe" is out of office then "Keith" can access Joe"s mail box and forward that client"s mail to his own mail box and in that case sender name
would be "Keith on the behalf of Joe". In such scenario neither Keith nor Joe can perform the call back.
For internal use only
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e)
DB-SDNY-0042553
CONFIDENTIAL
SDNY_GM_00188737
EFTA01356611
Technical Artifacts (5)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Domain
dbing.mail.db.comEmail
dana.zook@db.comEmail
janet.sible@db.comEmail
valerie.oconnor@db.comURL
http://dbIng.mail.db.comForum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.