Case File
efta-01385484DOJ Data Set 10OtherEFTA01385484
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01385484
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
3 January 2018
HY Corporate Credit
l-lY Multi Sector.Media, Cable & Satellite
Cable / Pay-TV: Market Weight Relative to the DB Index
The alarm bells around the maturation of the Pay-TV industry have been going
off for years. Despite clear headwinds that have undoubtedly had negative
impacts on cash generation, management throughout the industry has done
well in not only weathering the storm, but positioning their respective
companies for the future. For the wired cable companies, the natural business
pivot has been focusing on generating a higher mix of revenue from
broadband and venturing into commercial, which just so happens to have a
materially better margin and cash flow profile than the historical linear TV
business. For DBS, the challenge of reinventing itself has been much more
difficult considering it doesn't have an HSD offering into the household. While
DTV got acquired and integrated into a large platform at AT&T that has
inevitably helped its relevance and extended its lifespan, both DTV and DISH
saw the writing on the wall early and instead of trying to exclusively protect its
legacy subscriber base, which is a given, they created two of the industry's
best OTT products.
In addition to fighting top-line difficulties, margins have also been under
pressure as content and programming costs have been increasing at high-
single digit I low-double digit rates for the better part of a decade. The
response from operators has varied, but recent approaches can all be filed as
incrementally emboldened compared to even just five years ago prior to the
Pay-TV market cracking. Certain operators have resorted to going dark on
channels during negotiations. Others have completely eliminated certain
programming altogether and substituted with more attractively priced
alternatives. Then there are those providers like WaveDivision who simply pass
the cost of programming through to customers. The integration of OTT
products into the platform is more prevalent and actually lowers churn as the
complementary features and all-in-one place for access produces a more
seamless, enjoyable experience particularly via a cross-catalog guide. While
the OTT marketplace has gained market share and inspired certain
demographics to cut the cord and will continue to do so over time, we believe
the worries over linear TV trends are a bit too draconian. For example, in its
3Q17 Video Trends Report, TiVo points out that the number of respondents in
its survey that have cut cable within the previous 12 months declined for the
first quarter since 3Q16. It could just be an outlier, but after trending up 3% y/y
for the past year, it could also present a data point that supports the notion
that the biggest wave of cord cutting are the first movers, which is now
entering its own maturity stage. Should that trend continue declining, that
presents an even longer tail for linear TV which we believe would help the DBS
business most given they're more levered to that segment.
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
The reports of the Seth of linear
video will prove to be - as Mark
Twain would have saki - weedy
weggerated
We still expect
declines but we see linear video
decreasing at • modenste rate
with some carders such as DISH
and ATT offsetting some of these
losses with lower-ARPU OTT
video adds - partially lessening
the Mow.
In terms of cord shaving/cutting,
host quarter we actually sew the
bend of cord cutting decline fir
the first dine 6) recent history. It
is too toady to at this •
sustainable bond
though It
might be able to oiler some
support to the nodan that the
raging concerns own linear video
might prow overdone
The
blow worry for us remains
content pricing, which continues
to ina•as• at a pace that seems
impossible to ofhetkodre video
business.
Page 211
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e)
CONFIDENTIAL
DB-SDNY-0086770
SDNY_GM_00232954
EFTA01385484
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.