Case File
efta-01458962DOJ Data Set 10OtherEFTA01458962
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01458962
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
8 December 2015
World Outlook 2016: Managing with less liquidity
The investment spending recovery is losing momentum and turning volatile.
Financing conditions should remain supportive — most visible to date in
construction spending — but sluggish export demand and geopolitical risks
will likely weigh. The euro area labour market has improved more rapidly than
the historic Okun coefficient would have implied. This is consistent with
weaker post-crisis productivity. Limited prospective returns may be dampening
the investment recovery. The Juncker investment plan (European Fund for
Strategic Investments or EFSI) will help to lean again this trend.
Sovereign OE began in early 2015. The principal transmission channel was a
weaker exchange rate but the benefits were squeezed by the 7% appreciation
of the euro trade-weighted index between March and September, reversing
half the decline that preceded QE. This knocks 0.1% off 2016 GDP growth.
There are also domestic transmission channels for OF Real economy credit
conditions have improved to pre-crisis levels. The average interest rate on bank
loans to the non-financial corporate sector has fallen 80bp from the peak.
Lower interest rates supported asset prices and 2015 saw collateral values play
a role in easing lending standards for the first time since 2007.
Policy stance to benefit from joint roonetaryifiscal policy push
Financial conditions remain close to the easiest levels of the cycle even after
the miscommunication ahead of the December ECB meeting that left the
market disappointed with the outcome. What the ECB announced was
nevertheless close to our original expectations. We have not changed the FX
assumption underlying our economic forecasts that the euro falls by 5% in
trade-weighted terms between 2015 and 2016.
The ECB appears confident its unconventional policies are workIng, for
example, through the bank tending channel. There are challenges, however.
First. it may prove difficult to accelerate the credit impulse in 2016. The credit
impulse is based on the second derivative of bank credit. The credit impulse
improved in 2015 from the transition from deleveraging to credit expansion; for
some large countries like Spain, there was only a slower pace of deleveraging.
Maintaining the credit impulse at the same level in 2016 requires lending to
accelerate. With high debt ratios in several countries, this will be challenging,
not least in Spain. Second. the ECB is concerned about the high level of NPLs
and the slow pace of dealing with them. The flattening in the rate of GDP
growth could raise banks' caution. The flattening yield curve will also reduce
banks' incentive to lend.
The euro area benefited more from a combined monetaryifi.scal stimulus in
2015 than had been anticipated with the fiscal stance supportive of economic
growth for the first time since 2010. This should continue in 2016. The bottom-
up aggregation for the fiscal stance looks no stronger than 2015 but is
probably an underestimate (e.g., higher refugee and security-related public
spending).
We do not believe the joint policy push will persist. We are concerned that the
Commission's flexibility on the fiscal rules will reverse. Our early warning
indicator of fiscal crisis risk is below the levels it reached for the peripherals in
2009-2010. A moderate slippage in fiscal performance over the next year won't
change this assessment; the fiscal risk sub-index should be no worse in 2016
than in 2014. Our concern is more that idiosyncratic national political risks
materialise and amplify market concerns, for example, in Portugal (see below).
End 2016 could see the first ECB tapering discussion
If growth and inflation perform in line with our baseline forecasts, the
measures announced by the ECB on 3 December ought to be the last major
Deutsche Bank AG/London
Figure 5: Unexpected 2015 euro
appreciation dampens 2016 GDP
growth
In-a
6.44.194944•631•1ed 914.
u0 -
1t
•
103
95
93
ES •
Foncen
049.9.,44
9
.944v,
1%41/ COP
9=9m in
2012
2013
2014
2015
10
2017
Aa
—Proviounoweinpban
.!
•Cuertra eau motion
Saga —.
Bank Nerd. Eng
Figure 6: Financial conditions are
easy
Iwo area rem*. Fwrcs Coedemns
Ind*, 194.991•999.111
Stang meow now, tabwmatne.-
12
of summed deviations
10 1
00
OS
04
02
0.0
2014101 2014010 20141203
20150520 20151104
Sea 0a
Owst Ibuint Oftembr p Finn O. HMV
OreWo
r,
Figure 7: Bottom-up fiscal stance
estimates underestimating extent of
fiscal easing in 2016
1.5
j
OS
Tea wean' MFnP n OW 90941a
90" 190'690901
bassosimotawnwactnArsvm
drefrairan
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
Santo Diursdie Sr* Rase
arat•inGenwlsalen
Page 25
CONFIDENTIAL — PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e)
CONFIDENTIAL
SDNY_GM_00265316
DB-SDNY-0119132
EFTA01458962
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.