Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01660364DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01660364

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01660364
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Cc: Subject: RE: Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:37:35 +0000 Importance: Normal That is correct. We are still investigating and the investigation is currently active. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 From: Sent: Thursday. July 01 2010 2:36 PM To: Cc: Subject: RE: Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein Importance: High Dexter, The FD515 is an accomplishment report. I spoke with SA Richards and the FBI does not have an objection to releasing the two FD302's pertaining to Jane Doe's interviews. However, the subpoena is also asking for all items obtained during any criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, his co-conspirators or his former employee. If I'm not mistaken on the prior suli.m from Mermelstein & Horowitz, we did not want to release any of Epstein's information. Please discuss with AUSA and let me know if we are still in objection to releasing information regarding the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. Also please let me know if you want me to forward you a copy of the FD302's for Jane Doe. Thanks. ISM From: Sent: Thursda Jul 01, 2010 10:02 AM To: Subject: FW: Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein Deya, Attached please find Dexter response on the new subpoena. What is the FD515? Thanks. From: Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 1:44 PM EFTA01660364 To: Subject: RE: Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein Hi Dexter — When it rains, it pours. I am dealing with another Epstein issue now. The investigation is sort of re- opened, we are trying to track down new victims. But, in light of waiver, if the items she requests relate only to her, if FBI has no objection, then it seems alright to me. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 From: Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 5:28 PM To: Subject: FW: Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein Marie, The FBI has received a subpoena seekine documents relating to Jane Doe. There is a Privacy Act waiver attached which was signed by I The return date for the subpoena is July 8, 2010. I understand from the FBI that there are two FBI 302's responsive to the request. There is also an FD515, which the FBI believes is not responsive. Since has executed a Privacy Act waiver, permitting disclosure to Brad Edwards, there's no Privacy Act issue. Does the government have any privilege to assert regarding the responsive documents, e.g. law enforcement investigatory records, etc.? Thanks. From• Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 9:59 AM To: Cc: Subject: Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein Good morning I faxed over a new subpoena that we received on another Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein case. I faxed it to and asked her if she could assign it to you, since you were the one assigned this matter in the past. I spoke with a, he advised me that we do have two FD302's of Jane Doe's interviews, and an FD515. The FD515 would not be pertinent to their request. However, he suggested to have you contact the criminal AUSA and see what her position is on releasing the information requested. can be reached at if you need additional information. Please call me if you need any assistance. Thank you. Parale al FBI EFTA01660365

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01660111

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
Court UnsealedJun 16, 2023

Deutsche Bank Epstein victim questionnaire

EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:22-cv-10018-JSR Document 90-2 Filed 06/16/23 Page 1 of 12 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case No. 1:22-CV-10018 (JSR) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TO: ALL VICTIMS OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S SEX TRAFFICKING VENTURE DURING THE TIME PERIOD AUGUST 19, 2013 TO AUGUST 10, 2019 (THE “CLASS PERIOD”). IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR A SETTLEMENT PAYMENT, YOU (OR CLASS COUNSEL ON YOUR BEHALF) MUST TIMELY SUBMIT A TIER ONE FORM BY ___________, 20

12p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02335898

51p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.