Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01996317DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01996317

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01996317
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: jeevacation©gmail.con[jeevacation@gmail.com]; jeevacation mail.com['eevacation@gmail.com] From: Sent: Tue 1/25/2011 2:59:47 PM Subject: profit Jeffrey, Nick told me that his profit on the projector alone was $6,200 his price to us was $58,500 and he paid 552,300 for the DPI,. according to his last email, I interpret as Nick upgrading to the 3D projector at his cost with no profit to him,. I would like to speak to DPI tech's and find out if the 3D projector displays a better screen since its using a 3D lens capable, which according to Dawn. should be a better picture, since its a higher technology lens..not sure if that is true, but makes sense to me,,,l think you and I agreed that the 3D projector was a brighter sharper display, just my opinion, thanks Larry EFTA_R1_00490911 EFTA01996317

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Emaileevacation@gmail.com
Emailjeevacation@gmail.com

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.