EFTA02313589

From: Karyna Shuliak Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2019 4:44 PM To: Marc.Kensington Cc: Alex Peto Subject: Re: Bin Palace Dear Marc, Thank you for your response. 1. To fully research the potential undisclosed liabilities of pamur will ta=e time. 2. Is your vendor willing to provide a tax opinion that no tax is owed on t=ansfer or capital gains and there is no obligation or disclosure of money b=ing received outside of Morocco when the only asset is Moroccan? 3. Is your firm or Christies willing to stand behind the transaction, re tit=e, or tax guarantees, employment, agriculture or any local or state claim? =4. If not, what structure can you propose that doesn't obligate us t= accept a property and a company with unknown claims and virtually unlimite= liability? S. The property title deed you sent only shows no liablities as of 6 years a=o? 6. Where do you expect the money to be sent?and to what entity? BVI, Lichte=stein, who signs on behalf of this transaction? 7. I assume you are aware that under new intl banking regulations, the ultim=te owner, ie your vendors name will most likely be required to be disclosed=(anti money laundering, sanctions, tax disclosure ). The world financial sy=tem has changed since your vendor built this property. Look forward to your=suggestions and answers. Your fees would be paid to the company or to your f=rm directly? Thank you. Best regards, Karyna > On Feb 22, 2019, at 11:11 AM, Marc.Kensington wr=te: > Dear Karyna, > You will find attached some documents of the property Bin Ennakhil in Marr=kech: > - Statutes of Pamur Anstalt SA Liechtenstein > - Titre deed of the property in Marrakech owned by Pamur Sa > - Building permit > - Residential permit > The vendor offers the following procedure > - Formal binding offer for the purchase of Pamur Anstalt shares, subject t= a full due diligence > - Please confirm also our fees > - Transfer of a 10 % deposit on an escrow account of The Haze Trust to ope= at LGT Bank Vaduz > - Reception of all the legal documents of Pamur Anstalt SA and it mother c=mpany > - The staff in Marrakech is employed by a tiny Moroccan company that shoul= also be checked EFTA_R1_01203830 EFTA02313589 > - Due diligence of Pamur, it mother company and the local tax statement of=Pamur in Morocco (a notary can provide a quitus fiscal, which means that al= the taxes are paid) > - The vendor doesn't want to provide a liability guarantee. Therefor he re=uced his sale price > Could you please confirm that this way to procede is appropriate ? > Yours sincerely > <Residential permit.pdf> > <Building permit.pdf> > <Property title deed.pdf> > <Pamur Statutes.pdf> <?xml version=.0" encoding=TF-8"?> <IDOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/Propertylist-1.0.dtd"> <plist version=.0"> <dict> <key>conversation-id</key> <integer>47412</integer> <key>date-last-viewed</key> <integer>0</integer> <key>date•received</key> <integer>1550940269</integer> <key>flags</key> <integer>8590195713</integer> <key>remote-id</key> <string>15329</string> </dict> </plist> 2 EFTA_R1_01203831 EFTA02313590