EFTA02426738

Date

Unknown

Source

DOJ Data Set 11

Reference

efta-02426738

Pages

Persons

Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0upvotesShare

Post Reddit

Save Post Watch

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

To: Jeffrey Epstein[jeeyacation©gmail.com] From: Mark Fisher Sent: Tue 3/23/2010 1:23:48 PM Subject: Re: PS Thursday 330 PM or later is also good for me. • llam,12,1,or 2 pm? » yes fri? >> on Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Mark Fisher » wrote: >>> Are you coming to NYC this week? Meet? >> The information contained in this communication is >> confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may >> constitute inside information, and is intended only for >> the use of the addressee. It is the property of » Jeffrey Epstein >> Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this >> communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited » and may be unlawful. If you have received this >> communication in error, please notify us immediately by >> return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and » destroy this communication and all copies thereof, >> including all attachments. PROT1 PROT0

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Emailjeevacation@gmail.com

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01825134

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01658338

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p

DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02433761

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01482131

DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00010819

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Donate More ways to support →

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.