Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02514120DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02514120

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02514120
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Sent: To: Subject: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> Thursday, January 8, 2015 8:29 PM Re: Privileged and Confidential not advisable yet. its a tra= . no one cares re truth, most people know its bull, but like = celebrty divorce , they watch and eat popcorn. you will not change = single mind. when this blows over , you can and should =nd i will help put something out. but not while the wind is blowing so str=ngly Ori=Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 3:35 PM, < </=pan> wrote: Just =anded in NY. Will call as soon as I can. We are going to hire a PR firm to=help with the latest articles. I also need to hire a lawyer to make sure e=erything I say is OK, but I'm sick of not saying anything. I've wr=tten down a few thoughts on the plane: I'm sure it's too muc= info, but here is first draft. <=iv> I vehemently deny any allegations that I so called "=helped procure" prostitutes for JE. I used to be an executive assista=t who scheduled appointments for Mr E.; some of these appointments were fo= massages. I was never privy to what took place during those massages. I n=ver had anyone complain to me that something untoward was happening, nor d=d I ever witnesses anything questionable take place. I had never seen any =f these masseuses before until they arrived at the house of their own acco=d; they certainly did not look underage to me. I knew nothing about them. = never spoke to them other than to schedule massage appointments. I'm =orry if these women now regret their actions and professions, but I had no=hing to do with it. I'm sure the allure of making millions off their r=grettable decisions is enticing, especially when their lawyers are willing=to work for free to make a name for themselves. I have been unfairly victi=ized by these Jane Does, whom I don't even know who they are, their la=yers, and by the media making up endless lies about me and making up outra=eous allegations all because I followed the advice of my lawyers to plead =he Fifth for every single question asked of me, even a question as =imple as "what is your name?" I plead the Fifth on, in a civil s=it which I was subpoenaed for. I was a young woman whom all of a sudden my=name was caught up in something which I had no involvement with. I wanted =othing more than to answer all the questions asked of me by those unscrupurous lawyers, but felt it was best to follow the advice of my own lawyers t= plead the Fifth; what did I know about the legal system? So that's wh=t I did and am still paying the price 9 years later. I'm tired of allo=ing the media to abuse me to sell newspapers and not defending myself agai=st it. True, I once=worked for JE and lived in an apt on 66th St. I started my =business in 2006 while also working for JE. Since I couldn't afford a =eparate office at the time, I used my home address for my business address= I no longer live at that address, nor have I conducted business from that=address for many years. Yes, I changed my l=st name because I wanted to distance myself from my family who disowned me=over not being the same religion as them. It was too painful for me to use=the same last name as parents and siblings who didn't want me to be a =art of their family anymore. If your family wasn't willing to sp=ak to you over not wanting to be a Jehovah's Witness, would you want t= keep the same last name as them? EFTA_R1_01647558 EFTA02514120 Yes, I was marr=ed once before to my first boyfriend when I was a 17 year old woman. My fa=ily's religion didn't allow me to date, so getting married was the=only way to have a normal relationship with a man. This lasted 4 years unt=I he filed for divorce. Divorce is not allowed in the religion, thus the e=ders "disfellowshipped" me from the congregation. My family stop=ed speaking to me, and all of my friends from childhood never spoke to me =gain. If the press can't even get these=simple facts correct, how can we believe anything else they are writing ab=ut? Sent from my iPad please note The=information contained in this communication is confidential, may be att=rney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is inten=ed only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE U=authorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part=thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have receive= this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return=e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> , and destroy this communication and al= copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reser=ed 2 EFTA_R1_01647559 EFTA02514121

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Emailjeevacation@gmail.com
Phone2514120
Phone2514121

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

6p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

9p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Du..ument 511 Entered on FLSD Docku, J3/29/2010 Page 1 of 11

11p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.