Case File
efta-02514791DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02514791
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02514791
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, November 18, 2014 7:51 PM
To:
Kathy Ruemmler
Subject:
Re:
I would be happy to sit with him,
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 3=50 PM, Kathy Ruemmler <
> wrote=
DO1 Watchdog Wants Gre=ter Attorney Ethics Oversight
Zoe Tillman,=Legal Times
November 18, 2014
Investigating a=legations of attorney misconduct—and giving transparency to the pr=cess—continue to pose
challenges for the U.S. Department of Justic=, according to a new report
<http://www.justice.gov/oig/challenges/2014.htm> by the de=artment's independent inspector general.
Inspector General =ichael Horowitz urged Congress to adopt legislation that would give his of=ice more
authority to investigate alleged misconduct by DOJ lawyers. That =unction is primarily carried out by the department's
Office of Pro=essional Responsibility.
"The OIG has long questioned the ca=ving out of this exclusive role for [the Office of Professional Responsibi=ityj
as it is managed as a component of the department, has no institution=l independence, and lacks transparency in that it
does not regularly relea=e its reports and conclusions to the public," Horowitz wrote in th= inspector general's annual
report to Congress, which the office announced on Monday.
The Just=ce Department has long faced criticism for the lack of transparency when i= comes to how officials
handle complaints of attorney misconduct. The Offi=e of Professional Responsibility in most cases keeps information
about its=investigations secret. It has occasionally releases public reports on high=profile matters, such as the firing of
six U.S. attorneys in 2006 and the =otched prosecution of Ted Stevens in 2008.
The office's most recent annual report said that in 2013 =he office determined that 93 of the 819 complaints it
received were worth =dditional review, and launched full investigations into 33 of those matter=.
Under federal regulations, the inspector general's office=can ask the deputy attorney general for permission to
open an ethics inves=igation. That process "leaves the decision entirely to the departm=nt leadership and, in any event,
requiring the OIG to seek the department=E2 s permission before undertaking an investigation compromises our
i=dependence," Horowitz wrote.
Sens. Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Jo= Tester, D-Mont., introduced legislation in March
<http://www.lee.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/20=4/3/lee-tester-introduce-bill-to-ensure-proper-investigations-at-doj>
EFTA_R1_01648763
EFTA02514791
to remove the referral requirement, giving the inspector general =80 s office full authority to initiate attorney
misconduct investigation=. The Senate Judiciary Committee has yet to act on the bill.
Lawmak=rs and the inspector general's office have credited the recent pus= on ethics and transparency to a
report published earlier this year <http://www.pogo.org/our-work/r=ports/2014/hundreds-of-justice-attorneys-
violated-standards.html> by the Project on Government Oversight. The study identified hundred= of ethics violations by
DOJ attorneys and was critical of the lack of tra=sparency surrounding the Office of Professional Responsibility's
i=vestigations.
A Justice Department representative could not immedia=ely be reached for comment.
The inspector general's report =dentified seven overarching challenges facing the department: upholding pu=lic
integrity, which included the issues with misconduct investigations; t=e state of the federal prison system; the balancing
of civil liberties wit= national security concerns; enhancing cybersecurity; using a performance-=ased management
system; oversight of law enforcement programs; and protect=ng taxpayer money.
please =ote
The information contained in this communication is confiden=ial, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute
inside informati=n, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the propert= of JEE Unauthorized use,
disclosure or copying of this communica=ion or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If =ou have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediatrly by return e-mail or by e-mail to
jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail=com> , and destroy this comm=nication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -=11 rights reserved
2
EFTA_M_01648764
EFTA02514792
Technical Artifacts (6)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Email
jeevacation@gmail.comPhone
2514791Phone
2514792URL
http://www.justice.gov/oig/challenges/2014.htmURL
http://www.lee.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/20=4/3/lee-tester-introduce-bill-to-ensure-proper-investigations-at-dojURL
http://www.pogo.org/our-work/r=ports/2014/hundreds-of-justice-attorneysRelated Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02585986
2p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02491994
1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02488388
2p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01800942
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA02085156
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA02208889
0p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.