Case File
efta-02515310DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02515310
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02515310
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
Kathy Ruemmler
Sent:
Sunday, October 19, 2014 12:55 PM
To:
jeffrey E.
Subject:
Re: NYTimes: Are Women Better Decision Makers?
Why would business be any different th=n other organizations -- that is, the performance of the organization is be=ter if
it functions effectively as a team? Not about making people ha=py, but making them feel respected, secure, etc.
Sent from my=i Pad
On Oct 19, 2014, at 8:49 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:
business is not about kee=ing the group happy , it is always about results. short time vs long t=rm . not firing
people , seems to be the failure of many empathetic c=os. leading to disaster.
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Kathy Ruemmler
wrote:
Yes, but empathy is different than consensus-bu=lding. The former comes from strength, the latter can
sometimes be bu= is often not.
Sent from my iPad
On Oct 19, 2014, at 6=38 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com»
wrote:
though i appreciate the attempt. very very=poor science.. 1. pain threshold for ice
water.&nb=p; 2. consensus, is the most profitable decision in only certain circumstanres. 3. as you and I know ,
leadership, is not often about=consensus.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Kathy Ruemmler
rote:
<http:qwww.nytimes.com/2014/10/19/opinion/sunday/are-women-better-decision-
makers=html?smprod=nytcore-ipad&smid=nytcore-ipad-share>
When stressed, men are more prone to taking risky bets with little payoff.
Sent from my iPad
EFTA_R1_01649614
EFTA02515310
please note
The=information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be atto=ney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intende= only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unau=horized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part the=eof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received thi=
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mai= or by e-mail to <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> , and
destroy this communication and all copies=thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
</=iv>
please note
=div>The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may=be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is=intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE=br>Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any p=rt thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have recei=ed this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
retur= e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> , and
destroy this communication and all=copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserve=
2
EFTA_R1_01649615
EFTA02515311
Technical Artifacts (4)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Domain
qwww.nytimes.comEmail
jeevacation@gmail.comPhone
2515310Phone
2515311Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02585986
2p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02491994
1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02488388
2p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01800942
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA02085156
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA02208889
0p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.