Case File
efta-02525677DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02525677
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02525677
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
Lawrence Krauss a
Sent:
Wednesday, February 14, 2018 5:30 PM
To:
Jeffrey E.
Subject:
final draft email
Dear =eil and Michael:
Attached is a copy of some correspondence from Buzzfeed, =hich has followed on six months of attempts (following on
their being =ontacted by a third party who made a claim regarding a selfie session =t an event in Australia that ASU and
ANU had previously shown to be =alse) to produce allegations of sexual harassment by me. Over =his period they
produced 5 false allegations, primarily off of web =laims which I subsequently demonstrated to be false. Nevertheless
=he harassment by them has continued.
Most recently, Buzzfeed searched for =ther defamatory examples, and through someone, presumably at Perimeter,
=eceived the following claim.
—At the Perimeter Institute's "Quantum to Cosmos" Festival in October =009, a
woman made a formal complaint of sexual harassment against you. =he institute immediately removed you from the
premises and banned you =rom ever coming =ack.
=/blockquote>
=/div>
=div class="">
After I disputed =his claim, they came back with the following claim, which they said was =n the
record by someone from Perimeter:
In October of 2009, you went to Waterloo, Ontario, to be a =uest
speaker at the Quantum to Cosmos Festival at the Perimeter Institute.
During the event, a sexual harassment complaint was filed =gainst you.
You were immediately removed from the premises and banned =rom
ever coming back.
EFTA_R1_01665582
EFTA02525677
The institute would not provide more details to respect the
=omplainant's privacy. =/span>
<=div>
<1=iv>
I disputed this, and included an email from you, Neil as a =emonstration that it
was false (I redacted the information that was not =elevant to them):
Begin =orwarded message:
From: "Neil Turok"
Subject: Holden XXX
Date: March 31, 2011 at 9:30:26 AM MST
To
Dear Larry,
I hope you're doing very well. It =as nice to have you at PI for the Q2C Festival
and I do hope you'll be =ble to visit again soon.
I'm writing in regard to Holden =XX, who I have been working with recently
=E241140
With my best wishes,
Neil
Subsequent=to that, Buzzfeed came back with the following:
Thank you for sending =he email from Neil Turok. We have raised this with the
Perimeter =nstitute, which has clarified its position, as follows:
During the event, a sexual harassment complaint was filed =ith the
administration against you.
2
EFTA_R1_01665583
EFTA02525678
In 2012, as part of a =ormal review of its internal policies, the institute
made a decision =hat you would not be invited to return.
I believe this final claim is false, and I would like =onfirmation from you. It may
be a fine point, but I believe it is =mportant. Originally Michael informed me immediately after the =vent in 2009 that
there was a complaint of inappropriate =ommunication with one of the staff--something I still dispute--but be =hat as it
may, he informed me by email that I shoudn't =ommunicate with the staff I had interacted with at the time, and the
=atter was then considered closed. Several years later I was =nvited to give another public lecture but your outreach
coordinator =ater rescinded the invitation, although I was reimbursed for that. =nbsp;As you are aware, I subsequently
discussed my concern about this =ith Neil in Vancouver in that year, and inquired about exactly what it =as all about, and
informed him that either a formal procedure to resolve any issue in which I could participate and respond might be
=ppropriate, or the matter should be dropped. Neil said he would explore =he matter, and neither he, nor anyone else,
ever contacted me following =hat. I have never been informed of anything like Buzzfeed has =laimed. Indeed I have
been invited back to Perimeter for scientific =eetings by various colleagues in the intervening years. I =ould find it
highly irregular if any formal procedure took place with =uch an outcome without my knowledge or without any due
process, and =ithout subsequently informing me, and all evidence I have suggests the =ontrary.
I am very concerned by this claim below, for obvious reasons. =nbsp;First, the
original Perimeter source provided false and defamatory =nformation to Buzzfeed, changing a story only after I provided
=ounter-evidence.
The accurate history if there is one, is =hat there was a complaint from someone at Perimeter
about inappropriate =ommunication and that 3 years later a decision was made by the =utreach coordinator, perhaps in
collaboration with others, not to =nvite me back at that time for a public lecture. I would like to =ave your confirm for
me that Buzzfeed's claim is incorrect a it =tands I would prefer to leave it at that, but if necessary one =ould add that
there was a report of inappropriate communication with an =mployee at the event at the time, which I disputed and the
matter was =losed.
Please =onfirm my understanding of this issue for me if you will. As you =an
imagine, making this public is embarrassing for me, Buzzfeed =as tried, at every turn, to misrepresent facts in the worst
possible =ight, it is important for me to not allow them to continue to do this =ith impunity. For example, they
contacted my university and asked =f there any claims fo sexual harassment against me, and though the =niversity
explicitly replied there were none from the University, but =hat there was an external allegation about a remote event
that the =niversity had investigated and had discredited (the one I mentioned =bove) and about which they would
therefore not provide further =nformation, Buzzfeed informed me that they intended to report that they =ontacted the
University with a request for information about sexual =arassment allegations at ASU and that the University would not
give =hem any information.
Last, while it would not ber surprising if Buzzfeed has =eiinterpeted statements
from Perimeter staff just to elicit a response, =ut if a member of your staff made the original false allegation to =uzzfeed
(violating confidentiality in the process I expect) I wanted =ou to be aware of this possibility, and if necessary act
=ccordingly.
I really appreciate your prompt attention to this =equest.
Lawrence Krauss
Lawrence M. =rauss
Director, The Origins Project at ASU
Co-Director, Cosmology Initiative
Foundation Professor
School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics =epartment
3
EFTA_R1_01865584
EFTA02525679
Arizona State University, P.O. Box =71404, Tempe, AZ 85287.1404
-Origins Project =0 Year Celebration-
Be a part of =omething 10 years in the making!
April 5-9th 2018 — Visit for more info <https://www.originsl0year.com/>
4
EFTA_R1_01665585
EFTA02525680
Technical Artifacts (6)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Phone
2525677Phone
2525678Phone
2525679Phone
2525680Phone
287.1404URL
https://www.originsl0year.comRelated Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02512763
3p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01873814
3p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02624186
3p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01984612
0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Lawrence Krauss <Ma>
2p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01871509
0p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.