Case File
efta-02570504DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02570504
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02570504
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>
Sent:
Thursday, June 6, 2013 2:55 PM
To:
Steven Sinofsky
Subject:
Re: contract
I'll call after board meeting
On Thursday, June =, 2013, Steven Sinofsky wrote:
I think there are three things:
•
T=e timeline of section 6 is endless. For this just isn't workable.=A0 A big part of this agreement is
closure. So that isn't closure.=A0
•
Not paying. It feels to me that this agreement makes it trivial for =hem to just not pay. Then I have to
sue to get paid. That seems pret=y weak in the agreement and likely. I get that if they don't want t= pay they just won't,
but the way disparagement is done it is trivial to=not pay--take some article that implies I said something (not a quote
just=reporters words) and then they don't pay. They are rolling the dice o=er if I sue or not. But the cost of the suit will
be greater than the p=yback for me so they win.
•
So far, their behavior has been crazy. It seems likely it will get m=re crazy. That means the section
needs to be solid with respect to c=azy.
Sent from Wind=ws Mail on Surface RT
http://blo=.learningbyshipping.com <http://blog.learningbyshipping.com>
F=om: Jeffrey Epstein
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2013 5:22 AM
To: Steven Sinofs=y
I @stevesi
http://blog.thekongfirm.com/2010=08/19/nondisparagement-clauses-whats-the-big-deal.aspx
<http://blog.thekongfirm.com/2010/08/19/nondisparagement-clauses-=hats-the-big-deal.aspx>
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Steven Sinofsky <
/span> wrote:
But the way it=reads it is for perpetuity and I can't really talk about Microsoft. =A0I just can't have that.
Reply message
From: "Jeffrey Epstein" <jeevacation@gmail.com>
To: "Steven Sinofsky" <>
Subject: contract
Date: Thu, Jun 6, 2013 3:48 AM
EFTA_R1_01738507
EFTA02570504
I think it is ok. lets talk, they will never sue you=for disparagement. it would make them look ridcitulis
, =t is bad enough that they put in the non compete for 5 months.
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Steven Sinofsky <
rote:
Their comments will not be owned by them ... they will just be stories=about me that they
placed (including the defense of this contract).
the biggest issue for me is section 6 -- it is a perpetuity agreement.=A0 I was on a 12 month
schedule for this whole thing. I can't figure rut what can be said or not and for how long or not.
Sent from Windows Mail
F=om: Jeffrey Epstein
Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 1:43 PM
To: Steven Sinofsky
You can respond to their comments with abandon sobibdo not see a real issue=A0
On Wednesday, June 5, 2013, Steven Sinofsky wrote:
Section 2... a lot of section 6 hinges on this section which is that p=yment should be
made unless the agreement is "materially" breached A=D there is failure to cure. Defining what materially breached
means in =he context of section 6 is tricky and curing a vague concept of disparagement is tricky. There's an easy
argument =f "cannot unring the bell" that gets made. What I worry about is =asically not getting paid and then having to
sue.
6b. This reads like a permanent restraining order on talking about =icrosoft. Hard to
see how I could write a book or talk about Microsoft =ver. This is not good. The end date for everything was supposed
to b= 12 months. This vaguely extends it to jan 2016 but then has a clause that seems to on forever.
6c. switches to first person weirdly "me"
14. this gives 21 days for me to sign. we should understand
<=div>
</=lockquote>
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be =ttorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is in=ended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffr=y Epstein
2
EFTA_R1_01738508
EFTA02570505
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any par= thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have receiv=d this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
retur= e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailtojeevacation@gmail.com> , and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachm=nts. copyright -all rights reserved
3
EFTA_R1_01738509
EFTA02570506
Technical Artifacts (9)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Email
jeevacation@gmail.comEmail
mailtojeevacation@gmail.comPhone
2570504Phone
2570505Phone
2570506URL
http://blo=.learningbyshipping.comURL
http://blog.learningbyshipping.comURL
http://blog.thekongfirm.com/2010/08/19/nondisparagement-clauses-=hats-the-big-deal.aspxURL
http://blog.thekongfirm.com/2010=08/19/nondisparagement-clauses-whats-the-big-deal.aspxRelated Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01951206
1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01957994
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01908908
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01943353
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01910637
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01912337
0p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.