Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02595355DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02595355

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02595355
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Barnaby Marsh Sent: Sunday, November , : To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: Yes I was going to talk to Martin toda=.. there are several parts. Some of the things I am figu=ing out on my end: For Joi- a first question is wh=ther this is connected with MIT (overhead) or goes another route. The latt=r seems desirable, but I hear that MIT is not too happy with this. We need=to makes sure there is not blockage. The bigger, more important issue is t=at the money enables something very unusual. I still am not convinced the =oi has all of the background details figured out. My team is working with =is people who do the background stuff, but it is not clear where the loyal=ies are here - to the Lab, or to Joi. For Martin- He has a c=rrent Templeton grant that runs through 2015 (already funded) and a second=now in the works that will begin in late 2015 and extend through 2019. The=second grant is not yet reviewed or approved. Any offer to match on the se=ond grant will help secure it. Basically, all he needs is a short letter o= statement (even from him) that says that additional donated money will au=ment and boost any of the ideas and work that he is working on in the gran=. However, it can be used any way he wishes, including new directions, suc= as special fellowships. The work is broad, so, it should be easy (as far =s you are concerned). On my end, the thing that is taking long with Martin=is just the documentation- each time we need a proposal, and he, I, and ot=ers have to put together the justification ourselves. He does not have a g=ant-writing team, like many others do. Sometimes, he uses grad students or=postdocs, but in these cases the result does not have the polish or comple=eness that is needed in a competitive process with adversarial peer review= There are reasons that I won't go into for why I don't want to cu= corners on this sort of thing, and so, it just takes longer. -B. =/div> On Sun, Nov=23, 2014 at 7:07 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:je=vacation@gmail.com»=wrote: can we talk abou= your funding for joi and martin so that our mutual involvment gets =he best result •=A0 please note The information=contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client=privileged, may EFTA_R1_01779951 EFTA02595355 constitute inside information, and is intended only for=br>the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized =se, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is =trictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this co=munication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or b= e-mail to jeev=cation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> , and destroy this communication and all copies the=eof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 2 EFTA_R1_01779952 EFTA02595356

Technical Artifacts (5)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Emailcation@gmail.com
Emailjeevacation@gmail.com
Emailvacation@gmail.com
Phone2595355
Phone2595356

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.