Case File
efta-02595355DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02595355
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02595355
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
Barnaby Marsh
Sent:
Sunday, November ,
:
To:
Jeffrey E.
Subject:
Re:
Yes I was going to talk to Martin toda=.. there are several parts.
Some of the things I am figu=ing out on my end:
For Joi- a first question is wh=ther this is connected with MIT (overhead) or goes another route. The latt=r seems
desirable, but I hear that MIT is not too happy with this. We need=to makes sure there is not blockage. The bigger, more
important issue is t=at the money enables something very unusual. I still am not convinced the =oi has all of the
background details figured out. My team is working with =is people who do the background stuff, but it is not clear
where the loyal=ies are here - to the Lab, or to Joi.
For Martin- He has a c=rrent Templeton grant that runs through 2015 (already funded) and a second=now in the works
that will begin in late 2015 and extend through 2019. The=second grant is not yet reviewed or approved. Any offer to
match on the se=ond grant will help secure it. Basically, all he needs is a short letter o= statement (even from him) that
says that additional donated money will au=ment and boost any of the ideas and work that he is working on in the
gran=. However, it can be used any way he wishes, including new directions, suc= as special fellowships. The work is
broad, so, it should be easy (as far =s you are concerned). On my end, the thing that is taking long with Martin=is just the
documentation- each time we need a proposal, and he, I, and ot=ers have to put together the justification ourselves. He
does not have a g=ant-writing team, like many others do. Sometimes, he uses grad students or=postdocs, but in these
cases the result does not have the polish or comple=eness that is needed in a competitive process with adversarial peer
review= There are reasons that I won't go into for why I don't want to cu= corners on this sort of thing, and so, it just
takes longer.
-B.
=/div>
On Sun, Nov=23, 2014 at 7:07 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:je=vacation@gmail.com»=wrote:
can we talk abou= your funding for joi and martin so that our mutual involvment gets =he best result
•=A0
please note
The information=contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client=privileged, may
EFTA_R1_01779951
EFTA02595355
constitute inside information, and is intended only for=br>the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized =se, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is =trictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
co=munication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or b= e-mail to jeev=cation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> , and
destroy this communication and all copies the=eof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
2
EFTA_R1_01779952
EFTA02595356
Technical Artifacts (5)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Email
cation@gmail.comEmail
jeevacation@gmail.comEmail
vacation@gmail.comPhone
2595355Phone
2595356Related Documents (6)
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.