Case File
efta-02638859DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02638859
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02638859
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>
Sent:
Friday, August 25, 2017 10:45 AM
To:
Richard Kahn
Subject:
Re: Next
pretty funny Neale.
even ,the=silly open gate proposal was in essence stepping into your shoes =AO for only 6 million
cash. BACK THEN !! then proposin= to distribute what they estimated to be almost the full total=-ie 14 of the 15
million of cash on the balance sheet ( I point out that t=at is .more than it totals today , -for chris ). and then =AO having
joel ,them and faith leverage themselves up by borro=ing at 7!! percent against the entire co in order to make a further
=istribution of an additional 15 m/ . on paper =AO creating a highly inflated enterprise value . he only proposed 6
=illion cash infusion. around the same amount that you are curr=ntly being offered. they valued faiths and joel
ongoing equity=, that they proposd they) " keep in" , silly, at 8 m. =AO roughly the same as we suggested. Financial
engineering don= well is like lipstick.. however not done well. is also =ike lipstick. . :) This is a personal service
busi=ess. no more no less. suggesting that they leverage themselve= up so you that they can pay themselves a higher
salary . =AO fails the HBS first year class that im aware youve taken. re the =8 million , we have distributions from Next
directly to the former s=areholders of the claxon offshore entity of approx 3. =AO re receivables . you can ask millie .
sor=y
PS
Faith and j=el will have to borrow the money to buy you out at S.. can be done, but n=t so easy. they have
never taken out real money from the co..C2 - in any form. salary etc. hence little net worth ,and c=rrent lenders are
not that comfortable with the potential liab=lites. .
On Fri, Aug 25= 2017 at 5:27 AM, Richard Kahn <
wrote:
Please =dvise. Thank you.
Richard Kahn
HBRK Associates Inc.
=div>575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10022
<tel
Fax
<te
Cell <= href="tel
' value="a'
target="_blank"
Begin forwarded message:
From: Neale Attenborough <
Date: August 24, 2017 at 4:50:55 PM EDT
To: Ricriard Kahn
Cc: Chris Lawler
<mailto
=a»
> >
> >
EFTA_R1_01870839
EFTA02638859
Subject: RE: Next
I look forward to our con=ersation.
For the record, we did ac=ually pay $18MM for 42% of this business in 2008. At the time that r=presented an -13x
multiple of EBITDA. That is not a fictitious number. In addition we did receive a bid for about the same amount f=om
Open Gate Capital, a reputable private equity firm. I do not unde=stand why you say that ii is "hardly legitimate".
Wh=le I did say we didn't expect to receive what we paid, I did not say it was immaterial.
I don't follow mo=t of what you say below and look forward to hearing your clarification. =AO However, can you please
clarify one statement specifically? What do you mean when you say the current receivables have not be reviewed in
y=ars?
Thanks,
Neale
From: Richard =ahn
<mailto
> ]
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 3:45 PM
To: Neale Attenborough
Cc: Chris Lawler
Subject: Next
confirmed thank you
We have reviewed your statements that you sent to us=along with the K-1's and some financials. Frankly, so=e of the
numbers are inaccurate as a result of millie. Your annual f=nancial statements were reviewed but not audited - shame
on all of you... Your calculation of Ebitda includes th=ngs like adding back foreign exchange costs? board fees etc. T=at
is not the way we look at what is unfortunately for all merely a=personal service business.
2
EFTA_R1_01870840
EFTA02638860
Faith and Joel make up the business, nothing more.=C2 We calculate the Ebidta, which we think is an odd way of
measu=ing value of a personal service biz with lots of competition and small gro=th opportuinties if any. Giving you the
benefit of the doubt, and ignoring how much you paid or if some of that mone= was repaid directly to the former
owners of Claxon and not truly understa=ding what you described as a fixed tax payment per quarter (ie based on wh=t I
think looking back over the past three years) ebitda looks like 4-5 million. We have bought ma=y small biz and usually
pay mom and pops for 1- 3 times ebita or more usua=ly 4 times net income. We are finding it difficult to ge= to more
than a 15 million total value for Next ( not including liabilities). The 18 million dollar bid that you mentioned Faith said
was =ardly legitimate. I think further review of the accounting tax etc.=is probably a waste of all our time. As you
rightly said, what you i=itially paid is somewhat if not totatly immaterial to todays value. You have not factored in the
liabilities, =AO both reputationally and fiscal yet. I think the 5 million cash o=fer or 6m over time is fair. I look forward
to our conversation on =uesday. As another note, the current receivables have not been reviewed for years...
Rich
On Au 24, 2017, at 3:28 PM, Neale Attenborough <=a href="mailto
wrote:
Disclaimer: This message contains infor=ation that may be confidential and/or privileged and is intended only for
=he person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure to any other person is strictly prohibited. If you
received this transmiss=on in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then destroy the=message. Opinions,
conclusions, and other information in this message that=do not relate to the official business of Golden Gate Capital
shall be understood to be neither given nor endorse= by the company. Where applicable, any information contained in
this e-mai= is subject to the terms and conditions in the relevant governing agreemen=. <=span>
=C2
<Mail Attachment.ics>
3
EFTA_R1_01870841
EFTA02638861
please note
Th= information contained in this communication is confidential, may be at=orney-client privileged, may constitute
inside information, and is inte=ded only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE =nauthorized use,
disclosure or copying of this communication or any par= thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have
receiv=d this communication in error, please notify us immediately by recur= e-mail or by e-mail to conversation-id
33896 date-last-viewed 0 date-received 1503657911 flags 8590195713 gmail-label-ids 7 6 remote-id 743256
<mailtojeevacation@gmail.com>
4
EFTA_R1_01870842
EFTA02638862
Technical Artifacts (7)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Email
jeevacation@gmail.comEmail
mailtojeevacation@gmail.comPhone
2638859Phone
2638860Phone
2638861Phone
2638862Phone
3657911Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01765224
0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02328489
1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA02125460
0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: "Jeffrey E." <jeevacation@gmail.com>
4p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02489202
1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA02086739
1p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.