EFTA02666160

From: Noam Chomsky < Sent: Monday, December 26, 2016 3:00 PM To: jeffrey E. Cc: Valeria Chomsky Subject: Re: For word meanings, the closest I can think =f to something like this is an array of meaning postulates, in Carnap'= sense, something that Jerry Fodor for one has toyed with. Multidime=sional, but not a field. I don't see how to work it out, or to e=tend it to the interpretations of longer units. On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 5:51 AM, j=ffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: happy chanukah. . - =C24t has anyone in the past made a linguistic model that used=fields instead of definitions. similar to a =agnet field. to some degree. there is no one vector that=describes the word but a field of them. home surrounded =y a field of definitions. not based on 3 d space but based on =ontext . one could integrate over the field. =C2* see smoothness. strength , change.. not sure it i= useful. but having fun please no=e The information contained in this communication is confidenti=l, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information= and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property =f JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communicati=n or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If yo= have received this communication in error, please notify us immediatel= by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.c=m> , and destroy this commun=cation and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -al= rights reserved EFTA_R1_01917117 EFTA02666160