EFTA02667128

From: Peter Fenwick Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 3:27 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: FW: Sunday experiment Results of the Sunday =xperiment analysed by Fabio. 4 Subjects 18 trials and the =orrelation matrix. We will try and do another this Saturday. =ou mentioned a dual pen recorder to confirm timing. That I will leave =o the main experiment as we will have plenty of timings available in =hat. This is a simple experiment, is it Cult or is it =nteresting? Looks interesting! Let me know if you want =nything else for Saturday. Peter From: Fabio Babiloni =mailto Sent: 07 May 2018 =0:14 To: Peter iuseppe Bersani •‘ >; Corazza, Ornella =1 Andreas loannides Viirre, Erik rget Subject: R: =undayexperiment ° Dear Peter, thank you for sending such numbers to me. Indeed, it seems =hat something is moving there © I have to state several =hings: 1. If the number of correlation tests performed is 4 (e.g. =lain against the four students) then the level of r to be taken into =onsideration by using Bonferroni correction is as follows (r = =,57) From this point of view we are quite close the same to the =ignificance for some of them. EFTA_R1_01918755 EFTA02667128 2. However, Bonferroni =orrection is something that is quite harsh but it is indeed appropriate =or multiple execution of unilateral tests. Maybe Holm will be more =ppropriate (resulting maybe in a lower threshold). 3. If you run the =orrelation everybody as everybody we obtained e.g a correlation also between MC and =E which is slightly superior to those demonstrated between AF and MC. =/span> Thus, the evidence in this first round =1 just imagine exausting for AF) is interesting and encouraging for AF =nd MC and FE. In fact, the correlation is along the statistical =ignificance, although not definitively higher. It could be investigated =ore. I would like to know who established =he sequence of AF and if sequence could be determined "a =riori" the next time you will run an experiment. I suggest another day =when possible) with the same subjects, again 18 trials. Also, with a =equence predetermined for AF to be generated (maybe Andy could deliver =o Peter the binary sequence to be read by AF the day of the =xperiment). Those data could be concatenated with =his actual data, giving a longer sequence of further significance for =ur investigation. I also suggest to run an =xperiment: 1. without the presence of AF =/span> 2. with AF forced to generate all Os. =/span> This will set the "actual =ero" level of correlation (other than random binomial =istribution) of our experiment also. Although is very unpleasant to =uggest, is just to be sure that we remove further cricitisms from =eviewers by exploring the natural "noise" level of the =xperiment. All the best from Dubai Fabio 2 EFTA_R1_01918756 EFTA02667129 Prof. Fabio Babiloni, PhD Ass. Editor of IEEE Transaction on =eural System & Rehabilitation Engineering Ass. Editor of IEEE Transaction on =iomedical Engineering Editor in Chief of International =ournal of Bioelectromagnetism Dept. Molecular Medicine, University =f Rome Sapienza Scientific Director of BrainSigns srl, =a =refehttp://www.brainsigns.comr>www.brainsigns.com Da: Peter Fenwick < Inviato: lunedi 7 maggio 2018 =0:14 A: 'Fabio Babiloni' < =Viirre, Erik' Oggetto: Su Hi all, ore lain rorgets < >; 'Corazza, Ornella' Thanks Fabio for =our data analysis of the random data. I used the same data for =Ian and it is labelled AF, only one set so they are all the same. Sundays experiment =as carried us forward. There are two outstanding subjects, and two =ubjects about chance. Is that correct Fabio. If it is then it =eans that we will have to select people up the experiential chain and =ossibly those who have evidence of the Siddhis as they are likely to =how the most exciting neurophysiology. That will limit us =o about six subjects. Sundays group all signed informed consent. The number of years =eeing the light is in the table below. Do we now know =nough to go forward. Comments please and Fabio what does the =nalysis show. Kevin and Andy any views. 3 EFTA_R1_01918757 EFTA02667130 Setting. A =lanket obscured AF from the subjects. Epoch length was 1 minute. =here was no noise in the giving or not giving of energy. 1 min then 30 =econds to rate data. If you would like to see the sheets I can =end them to you. A great bank holiday w/e. Best wishes, Peter =/p> II tuo 5 diventa 1000 Fai crescere la tua =niversita Dona it 5 per mille alla =apienza <1=iv> 4 EFTA_R1_01918758 EFTA02667131