Case File
efta-02679549DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02679549
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02679549
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
President
Sent:
To:
Monday,
arc
,
Jeffrey Epstein
:
M
Subject:
Thanks
•
I am finally home.
First, let me wish you a happy passover; second, thanks for the candor and the friendship. So you won't mind if I push
back.
There are, as I can see it, three issues and if each can be addressed, with a third round of checking, you might think
differently. I have had Lynne send on names.
1) The repertoire. The works we do are worth doing, sometimes because a masterpiece is unearthed, and sometimes,
something good but influential and worth hearing has been revived, and and sometimes as a foil from history against
which we measure our so called greatest hits. In all cases, the works have to be performed and experienced and
therefore performed. And we have a loyal following in the hall and on the internet. So something is working.
2) The format of the concerts is a curated one that links music with literature, politics, history--a necessary part of what
music is. In that sense the ASO is totally unique.
3) Botstein and the ASO. The truth is that I have been such a thorn of the side of critics, conductors and managers that I
am not surprised at what you found. But you will find support and real support within the profession. Pardon the
expression but I have not gotten medals and awards for anything but my work in music. I just got the Bruckner Medal
this month (the other recipients have been Toscanini and Walter, among others). And I got the same Austrian Cross for
contributions to music as Sir Simon Rattle--the same year. I hate that stuff, but there it is.
On 1--again think of Nabokov, whose favorite Russian poets were often obscure figures derided by all the other critics.
He stood alone. The Marschner is beautiful opera and a crucial link between Beethoven and Wagner. So I stand in the
Quixotic defense of works that are worth it--even if they are not as good as others. Music does not follow Darwinian
patterns (a longer discussion). It is not science. That is, if i may say so, a commonplace; the idea that history is a judge
that seems right but is not. One of the greatest plays was forgotten after the writer died and rediscovered in the 1920s,
100 years later--Woyzeck. That is just one example.
As to 2, that is one way to build an audience, by linking music to other forms of life--to pretentiously paraphrase
Wittgenstein.
And to No 3) I am still haunted by early criticisms by angry competitors and idiot ignorant critics who hated my ideas and
the fact that I was an outsider with another career in scholarship and education.
That being said, why not give me one last shot at proving the majority wrong. I have been at it for nearly 25 years, and in
the next five, if there can be no measured improvement on the execution front--then that will be that. But 120,000 sales
and a Grammy nomination for a rare work--a Popov symphony from the 1930s,--and more than 20 years of some real
success (we have generated a body of new scholarship in music history--is cause enough to inspire you to give us help.
This is my plea. But I am not Moses, and if there were a God, he would not be on my side. (Another reason to help).
I greatly cherish this new friendship and I have real admiration for how you go about doing things----tough as it is often I
truly enjoy the argument. But this time I and not your preliminary findings and researchers--am right. Given the
firestorm I created 20 years ago I am even surprised I did as well in your research, whatever grade you put on the result.
EFTA_R1_01983759
EFTA02679549
It is not the final exam, only a badly constructed mid-term, I am a bit proud not to have gotten a top grade. True
controversy rarely leads to praise in this business. Nabokov became famous and admired only at the end.
Leon
<?xml version="1.0" encoding='UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/Propertylist-1.0.dtd">
<plist version="1.0">
<dict>
<key>date-last-viewed</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>date-received</key>
<integer>1364172318</integer>
<key>flags</key>
<integer>8590195713</integer>
<key>gmail-label-ids</key>
<array>
<integer>27</integer>
<integer>7</integer>
</array>
<key>remote-id</key>
<string>284831</string>
</dict>
</plist>
2
EFTA_R1_01983760
EFTA02679550
Technical Artifacts (4)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Phone
2679549Phone
2679550Phone
4172318URL
http://www.apple.com/DTDs/Propertylist-1.0.dtdRelated Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA02151089
0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA02153457
1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
DS9 Document EFTA00386709
2p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02701896
1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA02150390
0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA02110260
1p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.