EFTA02686200

From: Warwick Wicksman < Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 11:43 PM To: jeffrey epstein Subject: RE: LSJ design sketches Attachments: Option GS -Section A and B.PDF FYI, in the sections we sent over, we dimensioned 14' to the bottom of the structure in the living room. If this is an open beam ceiling similar to the other spaces, it is another 6' to the underside of the roof/ceiling. Warwick Wicksman, AIA Principal Gensler 2500 Broadway Suite 300 Santa Monica, California 90404 USA http://www.Gensler.com <http://www.gensler.com/> Click here to view Gensler's 2010 Annual Report. chttp://www.gensler.com/uploads/documents/AR_2010_10_22_2010.pdf> From: Warwick Wicksman Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 3:33 PM To: 'jeffrey epstein' Subject: RE: LSJ design sketches Yes. He worked on these plans with the team, but he is not in this afternoon. Is there a disconnect? Do you want to call me at Warwick Wicksman, AIA Principal Gensler 2500 Broadway EFTA_R1_02011076 EFTA02686200 Suite 300 Santa Monica, California 90404 USA http://www.Gensler.com <http://www.gensler.com/> Click here to view Gensler's 2010 Annual Report. chttp://www.gensler.com/uploads/documents/AR_2010_10_22_2010.pdf> From: jeffrey epstein [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.comj Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 3:28 PM To: Warwick Wicksman Subject: Re: LSJ design sketches Is Tom working on this ? We went through all of this in detail Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone On Jan 21, 2011, at 6:23 PM, Warwick Wicksman < <mailto > wrote: We need to review that. Perhaps after between the entry gallery and the living room. See attached. Warwick Wicksman, AIA Principal Gensler 2500 Broadway Suite 300 Santa Monica, California 90404 USA http://www.Gensler.com Click here to view Gensler's 2010 Annual Report. <http://www.gensler.com/uploads/documents/AR_2010_10_22_2010.pdf> From: Jeffrey epstein [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.comj Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 3:16 PM To: Warwick Wicksman Subject: Re: LSJ design sketches 2 EFTA_R1_02011077 EFTA02686201 You could lower pool 2 ft bit if we lower living below 59 . How and where do we make the transition ? Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone On Jan 21, 2011, at 6:10 PM, Warwick Wicksman < <mailto > wrote: Ok. We can raise the ceiling height in the living room. A couple of questions: How low can we drop the floor elevation of the living room below +59'? • Do you have a preferred elevation from what we sent? We can't lower the pool ceiling height too much and fit in the mezzanine access, but we could lower the whole thing. Please send us comments on this, and we can update the layout to reflect it. Thanks, Warwick Warwick Wicksman, AIA Principal Gensler 2500 Broadway Suite 300 Santa Monica, California 90404 USA http://www.Gensler.com Click here to view Gensler's 2010 Annual Report. <http://www.gensler.com/uploads/documents/AR_2010_10_22_2010.pdf> From: jeffrey epstein [mailtoleevacation@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 3:01 PM To: Warwick Wicksman Subject: Re: LSJ design sketches 3 EFTA_R1_02011078 EFTA02686202 Warwick , Tom has all the dimensions of the living room . These are not those. Please copy Santa Fe . 20 ft ceilings in living . Height more important there than pool . Doors on east end match west end. Gallery height no more than 12 . Stairs to mezz cannot be in the center of pool Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone On Jan 21, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Warwick Wicksman < <mailto > wrote: Jeffrey, Attached please find some sketches based on what you and Tom reviewed at the Island last week. Plans ("G5 main level", "G5 lower level", and "G5 mezzanine level", "GS roof"): Please confirm if we are approved to proceed with this building layout. We need to get the main building going ASAP , and want to release the structural engineer and pool engineer to move ahead. Tom is still studying the stairs and the exterior elevations; that can continue to develop. But we need to know if the main "boxes" are set. Exterior Elevations ("elevation study A..." and "elevation study b..."): These sketches are based on what was discussed last week. • "A" includes sloped-roof and flat-roof version that matches the design of the existing buildings. * "B" includes a flat-roof mission-style concept for the living room, with the two options for the entry building (one mission, one matching existing). • Our initial preference is leaning towards the sloped-roof version of A, but we want to each scheme with you in more detail. Sections: These show the basic heights, based on the sloped-roof version of elevation "A". Please review and comment, and let us know if the floor plans are approved! Thanks, 4 EFTA_R1_02011079 EFTA02686203 Warwick Warwick Wicksman, AIA Principal Gensler 2500 Broadway Suite 300 Santa Monica, California 90404 USA http://www.Gensler.com <http://www.gensler.com/> Click here to view Gensler's 2010 Annual Report. chttp://www.gensler.com/uploads/documents/AR_2010_10_22_2010.pdf> <Elevation Study A 1-21-11.PDF> <Elevation Study B 1-21.11.PDF> <Option G5 -lower plan.pdf> <Option GS -mezzanine level.pdf> <Option GS main level.pdf> <Option GS -roof plan.pdf> <Option G5 -Section A and B.PDF> <Option G5 main level.pdf> 5 EFTA_R1_02011080 EFTA02686204